rs376722127
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.3286T>A (p.Ser1096Thr) variant in SOS1 has been observed in 0.01864% (24/128738) of non-Finnish European chromosomes in gnomAD v2.1.1. This variant was seen in several individuals whose clinical presentations lacked clear associations with a RASopathy (PMIDs: 22589294, 26580448, 27153395; Invitae internal data, SCV000659145.1; Baylor internal data; Greenwood Genetic Center internal data). Of note, this variant has also been seen in apparently unaffected parental samples (n=14) evaluated during whole exome sequencing suggesting that this variant may be likely benign; however, these cases were not well-phenotyped and therefore do not meet current requirements for BS2 (BS2 not met; GeneDx internal data). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA1624230/MONDO:0021060/004
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005633.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOS1 | NM_005633.4 | c.3286T>A | p.Ser1096Thr | missense_variant | 20/23 | ENST00000402219.8 | NP_005624.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOS1 | ENST00000402219.8 | c.3286T>A | p.Ser1096Thr | missense_variant | 20/23 | 1 | NM_005633.4 | ENSP00000384675 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000164 AC: 25AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000996 AC: 25AN: 250948Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000811 AC XY: 11AN XY: 135610
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000385 AC: 563AN: 1461514Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000366 AC XY: 266AN XY: 727080
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000164 AC: 25AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74366
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
RASopathy Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel | Mar 19, 2020 | The c.3286T>A (p.Ser1096Thr) variant in SOS1 has been observed in 0.01864% (24/128738) of non-Finnish European chromosomes in gnomAD v2.1.1. This variant was seen in several individuals whose clinical presentations lacked clear associations with a RASopathy (PMIDs: 22589294, 26580448, 27153395; Invitae internal data, SCV000659145.1; Baylor internal data; Greenwood Genetic Center internal data). Of note, this variant has also been seen in apparently unaffected parental samples (n=14) evaluated during whole exome sequencing suggesting that this variant may be likely benign; however, these cases were not well-phenotyped and therefore do not meet current requirements for BS2 (BS2 not met; GeneDx internal data). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
Noonan syndrome 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Noonan syndrome 4;C4551558:Fibromatosis, gingival, 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Aug 13, 2021 | - - |
Noonan syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Sep 22, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 04, 2019 | Variant summary: SOS1 c.3286T>A (p.Ser1096Thr) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 9.9e-05 in 251348 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00019 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 6.3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in SOS1 causing Noonan Syndrome and Related Conditions phenotype (3e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.3286T>A has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Noonan Syndrome and Related Conditions but was reported in an individual with osteosarcoma (classified as benign, Zhang_2015), in an individual with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer (classified as a VUS, Maxwell_2016) and in one family with idiopathic HCM where it segregated with disease in 2/3 individuals (maternal grandmother of the proband carried the variant and was unaffected by HCM, Kaski_2012). Furthermore, detailed evaluation by a dysmorphologist with experience in NS and related disorders revealed no phenotypic features suggestive of these conditions in either the proband or her mother (Kaski_2012). Therefore, these report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Noonan Syndrome and Related Conditions and in-fact are supportive of a lack of association with the disease phenotype. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, and no additional evidence supporting a pathogenic outcome since its initial evaluation, the variant was re-classified as likely benign. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 17, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31368652, 29493581, 31006259, 27153395, 24077912, 22589294) - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 24, 2023 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Fibromatosis, gingival, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at