rs3886641

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002047.4(GARS1):​c.1761G>A​(p.Thr587Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00273 in 1,612,726 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 113 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 54 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 59 hom. )

Consequence

GARS1
NM_002047.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.18

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GARS1 (HGNC:4162): (glycyl-tRNA synthetase 1) This gene encodes glycyl-tRNA synthetase, one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that charge tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded enzyme is an (alpha)2 dimer which belongs to the class II family of tRNA synthetases. It has been shown to be a target of autoantibodies in the human autoimmune diseases, polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
GARS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • spinal muscular atrophy, infantile, James type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).
BP6
Variant 7-30628621-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-30628621-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 360015.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.18 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0501 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GARS1NM_002047.4 linkc.1761G>A p.Thr587Thr synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 17 ENST00000389266.8 NP_002038.2
GARS1NM_001316772.1 linkc.1599G>A p.Thr533Thr synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 17 NP_001303701.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GARS1ENST00000389266.8 linkc.1761G>A p.Thr587Thr synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 17 1 NM_002047.4 ENSP00000373918.3
GARS1ENST00000675651.1 linkc.1761G>A p.Thr587Thr synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 17 ENSP00000502513.1
GARS1ENST00000675810.1 linkc.1659G>A p.Thr553Thr synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 16 ENSP00000502743.1
GARS1ENST00000675693.1 linkc.1593G>A p.Thr531Thr synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 18 ENSP00000502174.1
GARS1ENST00000675051.1 linkc.1560G>A p.Thr520Thr synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 17 ENSP00000502296.1
GARS1ENST00000674815.1 linkc.1392G>A p.Thr464Thr synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 17 ENSP00000502799.1
GARS1ENST00000674851.1 linkc.1392G>A p.Thr464Thr synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 18 ENSP00000502451.1
GARS1ENST00000444666.6 linkn.*182G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 15 of 18 3 ENSP00000415447.2
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*1475G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 15 of 18 ENSP00000502408.1
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkn.*861G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 15 of 17 ENSP00000501636.1
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkn.*1099G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 15 of 18 ENSP00000502464.1
GARS1ENST00000674807.1 linkn.*34G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 13 of 16 ENSP00000502814.1
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*1631G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 15 of 18 ENSP00000501655.1
GARS1ENST00000675859.1 linkn.*34G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 13 of 15 ENSP00000502033.1
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*1703G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 16 of 19 ENSP00000501884.1
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkn.*706G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 14 of 17 ENSP00000502571.1
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkn.*1212G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 14 of 17 ENSP00000501986.1
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkn.*1050G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 15 of 18 ENSP00000502373.1
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkn.*1193G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 14 of 17 ENSP00000501980.1
GARS1ENST00000676403.1 linkn.1761G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 14 of 16 ENSP00000502681.1
GARS1ENST00000444666.6 linkn.*182G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 15 of 18 3 ENSP00000415447.2
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*1475G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 15 of 18 ENSP00000502408.1
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkn.*861G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 15 of 17 ENSP00000501636.1
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkn.*1099G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 15 of 18 ENSP00000502464.1
GARS1ENST00000674807.1 linkn.*34G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 13 of 16 ENSP00000502814.1
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*1631G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 15 of 18 ENSP00000501655.1
GARS1ENST00000675859.1 linkn.*34G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 13 of 15 ENSP00000502033.1
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*1703G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 16 of 19 ENSP00000501884.1
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkn.*706G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 14 of 17 ENSP00000502571.1
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkn.*1212G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 14 of 17 ENSP00000501986.1
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkn.*1050G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 15 of 18 ENSP00000502373.1
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkn.*1193G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 14 of 17 ENSP00000501980.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0141
AC:
2144
AN:
152110
Hom.:
54
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0486
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00589
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00814
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00395
AC:
986
AN:
249570
AF XY:
0.00284
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0531
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00336
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00148
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00154
AC:
2250
AN:
1460498
Hom.:
59
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00140
AC XY:
1019
AN XY:
726578
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0521
AC:
1743
AN:
33442
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00338
AC:
151
AN:
44696
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26082
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39660
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000707
AC:
61
AN:
86232
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53380
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00226
AC:
13
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000747
AC:
83
AN:
1110916
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00330
AC:
199
AN:
60328
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.459
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
111
221
332
442
553
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
64
128
192
256
320
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0141
AC:
2145
AN:
152228
Hom.:
54
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0135
AC XY:
1008
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0485
AC:
2015
AN:
41530
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00588
AC:
90
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000829
AC:
4
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000250
AC:
17
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00806
AC:
17
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
107
213
320
426
533
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00717
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.0164
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Feb 22, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jun 27, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Distal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
Mar 31, 2022
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
1.3
DANN
Benign
0.76
PhyloP100
-2.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3886641; hg19: chr7-30668237; API