rs3916876
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000400.4(ERCC2):c.1737C>T(p.Val579Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000639 in 1,613,878 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00060 ( 9 hom. )
Consequence
ERCC2
NM_000400.4 synonymous
NM_000400.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.386
Genes affected
ERCC2 (HGNC:3434): (ERCC excision repair 2, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit) The nucleotide excision repair pathway is a mechanism to repair damage to DNA. The protein encoded by this gene is involved in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair and is an integral member of the basal transcription factor BTF2/TFIIH complex. The gene product has ATP-dependent DNA helicase activity and belongs to the RAD3/XPD subfamily of helicases. Defects in this gene can result in three different disorders, the cancer-prone syndrome xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D, trichothiodystrophy, and Cockayne syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 19-45353263-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-45353263-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 256015.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.386 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00104 (158/152106) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00726 (111/15286). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00617. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 85 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 9 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC2 | NM_000400.4 | c.1737C>T | p.Val579Val | synonymous_variant | 18/23 | ENST00000391945.10 | NP_000391.1 | |
ERCC2 | XM_011526611.3 | c.1659C>T | p.Val553Val | synonymous_variant | 17/22 | XP_011524913.1 | ||
ERCC2 | XR_001753633.3 | n.1770C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 18/24 | ||||
ERCC2 | XR_007066680.1 | n.1692C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 17/23 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00104 AC: 158AN: 151988Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
158
AN:
151988
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00225 AC: 565AN: 251286Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00190 AC XY: 258AN XY: 135844
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
565
AN:
251286
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
258
AN XY:
135844
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000598 AC: 874AN: 1461772Hom.: 9 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000562 AC XY: 409AN XY: 727202
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
874
AN:
1461772
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
409
AN XY:
727202
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00104 AC: 158AN: 152106Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00114 AC XY: 85AN XY: 74360
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
158
AN:
152106
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
74360
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | ERCC2: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 12, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group D;C1853102:Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 2;C1866504:Trichothiodystrophy 1, photosensitive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jan 10, 2022 | - - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group D Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at