rs397515869
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000169.3(GLA):āc.1153A>Gā(p.Thr385Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000231 in 1,210,267 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. There are 159 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000169.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLA | NM_000169.3 | c.1153A>G | p.Thr385Ala | missense_variant | 7/7 | ENST00000218516.4 | NP_000160.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLA | ENST00000218516.4 | c.1153A>G | p.Thr385Ala | missense_variant | 7/7 | 1 | NM_000169.3 | ENSP00000218516.4 | ||
RPL36A-HNRNPH2 | ENST00000409170.3 | c.300+2489T>C | intron_variant | 4 | ENSP00000386655.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000142 AC: 16AN: 112532Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000317 AC XY: 11AN XY: 34686
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000556 AC: 102AN: 183479Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000898 AC XY: 61AN XY: 67915
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000240 AC: 263AN: 1097682Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000408 AC XY: 148AN XY: 363042
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000142 AC: 16AN: 112585Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000317 AC XY: 11AN XY: 34749
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Fabry disease Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 26, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 18, 2015 | p.Thr385Ala in exon 7 of GLA: This variant is not expected to be disease causing on its own because it has been identified in 0.5% (53/10122; including 36 males ) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://e xac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs397515869). Furthermore, it has been identified by our laboratory in 2 adults (1 male, 1 female) with DCM and did not segregate with disease in either family. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 30, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 07, 2020 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at