rs41267074

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000434.4(NEU1):c.408G>A(p.Gly136Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00172 in 1,612,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

NEU1
NM_000434.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.297

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NEU1 (HGNC:7758): (neuraminidase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a lysosomal enzyme that cleaves terminal sialic acid residues from substrates such as glycoproteins and glycolipids. In the lysosome, this enzyme is part of a heterotrimeric complex together with beta-galactosidase and cathepsin A (the latter is also referred to as 'protective protein'). Mutations in this gene can lead to sialidosis, a lysosomal storage disease that can be type 1 (cherry red spot-myoclonus syndrome or normosomatic type), which is late-onset, or type 2 (the dysmorphic type), which occurs at an earlier age with increased severity. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

NEU1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

sialidosis
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
sialidosis type 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
congenital sialidosis type 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
juvenile sialidosis type 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
sialidosis type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

NEU1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).

BP6

Variant 6-31861395-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-31861395-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 559022.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.297 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00101 (154/152276) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00198 (135/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00171. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 57 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NEU1	NM_000434.4 link	c.408G>A	p.Gly136Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 6	ENST00000375631.5	NP_000425.1	Q99519Q5JQI0

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NEU1	ENST00000375631.5 link	c.408G>A	p.Gly136Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 6	1	NM_000434.4	ENSP00000364782.4		Q99519

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00101

AC:

154

AN:

152158

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000362

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00198

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000958

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000958

AC:

236

AN:

246286

AF XY:

0.000960

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000266

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000174

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00201

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000494

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00180

AC:

2628

AN:

1460662

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00171

AC XY:

1241

AN XY:

726634

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000388

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000201

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000383

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000230

AC:

AN:

52206

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00229

AC:

2541

AN:

1112006

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000861

AC:

AN:

60384

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

159

318

476

635

794

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

102

204

306

408

510

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00101

AC:

154

AN:

152276

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000765

AC XY:

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000361

AC:

AN:

41532

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00198

AC:

135

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000948

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00170

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000952

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00125

EpiControl

AF:

0.00119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Jun 28, 2017

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

NEU1: BP4, BP7 -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sialidosis type 2

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.57

CADD

Benign

3.8

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.71

PhyloP100

-0.30

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over