rs41293521

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 2P and 12B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.9292T>C​(p.Tyr3098His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000225 in 1,613,898 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y3098C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00022 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:3B:21O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.618

Publications

34 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 6 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 14 benign, 17 uncertain in NM_000059.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.032249957).
BP6
Variant 13-32394724-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32394724-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 38227.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.9292T>C p.Tyr3098His missense_variant Exon 25 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.9292T>C p.Tyr3098His missense_variant Exon 25 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.8923T>C p.Tyr2975His missense_variant Exon 25 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.*1350T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 24 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.*1350T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 24 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000263
AC:
40
AN:
152240
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000916
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000291
AC:
73
AN:
250874
AF XY:
0.000251
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000291
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000654
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000221
AC:
323
AN:
1461540
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000206
AC XY:
150
AN XY:
727056
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000896
AC:
3
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00103
AC:
46
AN:
44694
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26116
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39686
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86210
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000187
AC:
1
AN:
53402
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000173
AC:
1
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000228
AC:
253
AN:
1111808
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000315
AC:
19
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18
37
55
74
92
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000263
AC:
40
AN:
152358
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000242
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74514
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000722
AC:
3
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000915
AC:
14
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000279
AC:
19
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
9
12
15
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000236
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000446
ExAC
AF:
0.000255
AC:
31
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:21Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2Benign:7
Sep 05, 2008
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 10, 2015
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000349 -

Nov 03, 2014
Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 07, 2015
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 29, 2002
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 24, 2015
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 20, 2014
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:5Other:1
Dec 07, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Has been reported in 2 families with female breast and ovarian cancer (Serova-Sinilnikova 1997). Has been classified as benign by Akbari 2011 (based on Myriad classification criteria), Bodian 2011 (presence in controls), Guidugli 2014 (functional assay), Lindor 2012 (posterior probability model OR). No functional impact in DNA break repair assay (Guidugli 2013). B/LB by SCRP, GeneDx, Ambry, Counsyl, Invitae; VUS by BIC in ClinVar. -

Jan 10, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Mar 11, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 19, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Nov 29, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

not provided Benign:2
Oct 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRCA2: BP4, BS1, BS3 -

Jun 05, 2017
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Apr 13, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
Sep 23, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2, p.Tyr3098His variant was identified in 6 of 5110 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast, ovarian and prostate cancer (Borg 2010, Edwards 2003, Gayther 1999, Serova-Sinilnikova 1997). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs41293521) as “other”, Clinvitae database (classified as benign by ClinVar and Invitae; uncertain significance by ClinVar), ARUP Laboratories BRCA Mutations Database (classified as not pathogenic), the ClinVar database (classified as benign by ENIGMA, MMGLUM, Invitae, Ambry Genetics, SCRP; likely benign by CHEO, GeneDx, Consyl; uncertain significance by BIC), GeneInsight COGR database (classified as benign, likely benign or uncertain significance by a clinical laboratories), the BIC database (33x with unknown clinical importance). This variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 2 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004), the Exome Aggregation Consortium database (August 8th 2016) in 31 of 117284 chromosomes (freq. 0.0003) in the following populations: Latino in 15 of 11252 chromosomes (freq. 0.001), European in 15 of 93796 chromosomes (freq. 0.0002), African in 1 of 10290 chromosomes (freq. 0.0001), but was not seen in Asian, Finnish and other populations. In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants (c.3841C>T (p.Gln1281X), c.1953dup (p.Lys652GlufsX21); c.6405_6409delCTTAA (p.Asn2135LysfsX3)), increasing the likelihood that the p.Tyr3098His variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in two individuals with breast cancer. The p.Tyr3098 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In addition, several functional studies classified this variant as class 1 (IARC) with probability of being deleterious 1.07×10−5 (Guidugli 2013, Lindor 2012). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.059
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.17
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.070
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.13
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.99
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.051
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.045
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.032
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
PhyloP100
0.62
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.39
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.45
Sift
Benign
0.78
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T
Vest4
0.35
MVP
0.76
MPC
0.022
ClinPred
0.0033
T
GERP RS
1.6
gMVP
0.36
Mutation Taster
=88/12
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41293521; hg19: chr13-32968861; API