rs41298745

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.4620G>A​(p.Ala1540=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00121 in 1,575,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.764
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 11-77199586-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77199586-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43251.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.764 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0011 (167/152312) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00684 (33/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00501. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 84 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 9 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4620G>A p.Ala1540= synonymous_variant 35/49 ENST00000409709.9 NP_000251.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.4620G>A p.Ala1540= synonymous_variant 35/491 NM_000260.4 ENSP00000386331 Q13402-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00109
AC:
166
AN:
152192
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000700
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00684
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000282
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00175
AC:
346
AN:
197538
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00227
AC XY:
243
AN XY:
107164
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000354
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000683
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000678
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00814
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000113
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000988
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000392
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00122
AC:
1735
AN:
1422796
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00145
AC XY:
1021
AN XY:
703320
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000475
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00362
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000263
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00756
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000159
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000793
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00110
AC:
167
AN:
152312
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00113
AC XY:
84
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00684
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000282
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000947
Alfa
AF:
0.00107
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000956
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 12, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2023MYO7A: BP4, BP7 -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesFeb 20, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJul 05, 2015Ala1540Ala in Exon 35 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, it is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence, and it has been observed in 1.9% (78/4130) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exa c.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs41298745). -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
MYO7A-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 01, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
5.9
DANN
Benign
0.68

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.090
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41298745; hg19: chr11-76910631; API