rs41303255

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):​c.4586A>T​(p.Lys1529Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000344 in 1,613,738 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.00900
Variant links:
Genes affected
USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM1
In a domain Laminin G-like 1 (size 192) in uniprot entity USH2A_HUMAN there are 29 pathogenic changes around while only 4 benign (88%) in NM_206933.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007950932).
BP6
Variant 1-216175293-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-216175293-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 48520.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=4}.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
USH2ANM_206933.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4586A>T p.Lys1529Ile missense_variant 21/72 ENST00000307340.8 NP_996816.3
USH2ANM_007123.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.4586A>T p.Lys1529Ile missense_variant 21/21 NP_009054.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
USH2AENST00000307340.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.4586A>T p.Lys1529Ile missense_variant 21/721 NM_206933.4 ENSP00000305941 P1O75445-1
USH2AENST00000366942.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.4586A>T p.Lys1529Ile missense_variant 21/211 ENSP00000355909 O75445-2
USH2AENST00000674083.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.4586A>T p.Lys1529Ile missense_variant 21/73 ENSP00000501296 O75445-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00174
AC:
265
AN:
152164
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00596
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000983
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000455
AC:
114
AN:
250490
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000355
AC XY:
48
AN XY:
135366
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00665
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000198
AC:
289
AN:
1461456
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000177
AC XY:
129
AN XY:
727024
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00699
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000253
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000530
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00175
AC:
266
AN:
152282
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00157
AC XY:
117
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00597
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000981
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000491
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00218
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00681
AC:
30
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000560
AC:
68

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 18, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26969326) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesApr 13, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Usher syndrome type 2A Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAl Jalila Children’s Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality HospitalJan 07, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jan 17, 2020- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineAug 11, 2014Lys1529Ile in Exon 21A of USH2A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.7% (30/4406) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs41303255). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 28, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 04, 2022Variant summary: USH2A c.4586A>T (p.Lys1529Ile) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Laminin G domain (IPR001791) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00046 in 250490 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in USH2A causing Usher Syndrome (0.00046 vs 0.011), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.4586A>T has been reported in the literature as a heterozygous genotype in at-least one individual affected with Usher Syndrome who was compound heterozygous for two different causal variants in the USH2A gene (example, Sloan-Heggen_2016). Additionally, it has been reported as a heterozygous genotype in an individual with early onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD) and no evidence of hearing defect who harbored a homozygous nonsense variant in the TTLL5 gene supporting a possible alternate etiology of disease (example, Smirnov_2021). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Usher Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments and a majority consensus as benign/likely benign (n=5), (VUS, n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBlueprint GeneticsOct 28, 2018- -
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.19
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.33
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.24
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.27
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.44
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.51
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.35
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.81
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.074
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0080
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.75
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.3
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.046
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0030
D;D
Polyphen
0.66
P;P
Vest4
0.39
MVP
0.95
MPC
0.081
ClinPred
0.077
T
GERP RS
-0.63
Varity_R
0.16
gMVP
0.51

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41303255; hg19: chr1-216348635; API