rs41305525
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_017780.4(CHD7):c.1018A>G(p.Met340Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00619 in 1,614,006 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 37 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0050 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0063 ( 33 hom. )
Consequence
CHD7
NM_017780.4 missense
NM_017780.4 missense
Scores
4
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.82
Genes affected
CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
PP2
?
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, CHD7
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00827083).
BP6
?
Variant 8-60742450-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60742450-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 95773.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-60742450-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr8-60742450-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00496 (755/152334) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00915 (140/15300). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00792. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 393 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 755 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD7 | NM_017780.4 | c.1018A>G | p.Met340Val | missense_variant | 2/38 | ENST00000423902.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD7 | ENST00000423902.7 | c.1018A>G | p.Met340Val | missense_variant | 2/38 | 5 | NM_017780.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00496 AC: 755AN: 152216Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
755
AN:
152216
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00462 AC: 1151AN: 249288Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00467 AC XY: 631AN XY: 135248
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1151
AN:
249288
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
631
AN XY:
135248
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00632 AC: 9236AN: 1461672Hom.: 33 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00623 AC XY: 4533AN XY: 727126
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
9236
AN:
1461672
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
4533
AN XY:
727126
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00496 AC: 755AN: 152334Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00528 AC XY: 393AN XY: 74494
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
755
AN:
152334
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
393
AN XY:
74494
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
37
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
31
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
7
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
62
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
506
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:10
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 25, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 23, 2017 | p.Met340Val in exon 2 of CHD7: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 0.63% (422/66716) of European chromo somes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs41305525). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 27, 2012 | - - |
Benign, flagged submission | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Jul 01, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Genomic Medicine (IGM) Clinical Laboratory, Nationwide Children's Hospital | Sep 07, 2017 | BS1, BS2, BP6; This alteration has an allele frequency that is greater than expected for the associated disease, was seen in a healthy adult where full penetrance of the disorder is expected at an early age, and was reported as a benign/likely benign alteration by a reputable source (ClinVar or other correspondence from a clinical testing laboratory). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 14, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Oct 03, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | CHD7: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
CHARGE syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Sep 05, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 23, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T
Polyphen
B;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at