rs41464156
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_144997.7(FLCN):c.1269C>T(p.His423His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000569 in 1,613,724 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_144997.7 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCN | ENST00000285071.9 | c.1269C>T | p.His423His | synonymous_variant | Exon 11 of 14 | 1 | NM_144997.7 | ENSP00000285071.4 | ||
ENSG00000264187 | ENST00000427497.3 | n.*103C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 7 of 12 | 1 | ENSP00000394249.3 | ||||
ENSG00000264187 | ENST00000427497.3 | n.*103C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 7 of 12 | 1 | ENSP00000394249.3 | ||||
MPRIP | ENST00000578209.5 | c.*18-1079G>A | intron_variant | Intron 5 of 5 | 3 | ENSP00000464276.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000532 AC: 81AN: 152194Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000743 AC: 185AN: 248868 AF XY: 0.000786 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000573 AC: 838AN: 1461412Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000587 AC XY: 427AN XY: 727024 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000532 AC: 81AN: 152312Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000430 AC XY: 32AN XY: 74488 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19562744, 19116017, 21937013, 29357828) -
- -
- -
- -
FLCN: BP4, BP7 -
Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome Benign:3
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
- -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
not specified Benign:1
- -
Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome 1 Benign:1
This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome;C0346629:Colorectal cancer;C1868193:Familial spontaneous pneumothorax;C2931246:17p11.2 microduplication syndrome;CN074294:Nonpapillary renal cell carcinoma Benign:1
- -
Familial spontaneous pneumothorax Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Colorectal cancer;CN074294:Nonpapillary renal cell carcinoma;CN375946:Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome 1 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at