rs446227
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000220676.2(RP1):c.5008G>A(p.Ala1670Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.253 in 1,613,814 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 53,835 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000220676.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RP1 | NM_006269.2 | c.5008G>A | p.Ala1670Thr | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000220676.2 | NP_006260.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RP1 | ENST00000220676.2 | c.5008G>A | p.Ala1670Thr | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_006269.2 | ENSP00000220676 | ||
RP1 | ENST00000636932.1 | c.787+6602G>A | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000489857 | |||||
RP1 | ENST00000637698.1 | c.787+6602G>A | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000490104 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.220 AC: 33457AN: 151910Hom.: 4263 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.259 AC: 65151AN: 251166Hom.: 9280 AF XY: 0.258 AC XY: 35014AN XY: 135808
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.256 AC: 374369AN: 1461786Hom.: 49563 Cov.: 67 AF XY: 0.256 AC XY: 185803AN XY: 727202
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.220 AC: 33490AN: 152028Hom.: 4272 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.220 AC XY: 16381AN XY: 74310
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 19, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Kyoto University | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Faculty of Health Sciences, Beirut Arab University | Oct 26, 2012 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University | Oct 01, 2023 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at