rs45517238
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM5BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.2476C>A(p.Leu826Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00135 in 1,613,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L826P) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.2476C>A | p.Leu826Met | missense_variant | 22/42 | ENST00000219476.9 | NP_000539.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.2476C>A | p.Leu826Met | missense_variant | 22/42 | 5 | NM_000548.5 | ENSP00000219476 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000690 AC: 105AN: 152254Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000679 AC: 170AN: 250542Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000730 AC XY: 99AN XY: 135688
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00142 AC: 2077AN: 1460694Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00142 AC XY: 1031AN XY: 726646
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000689 AC: 105AN: 152372Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000497 AC XY: 37AN XY: 74512
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:7
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 03, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Oct 05, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2024 | TSC2: PM5, BS1 - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 05, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 10, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 13, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 23, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 25, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.1% (62/65736) European chromsomes; ClinVar: 4 labs classify as LB. - |
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 10, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jun 01, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 14, 2019 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
not provided, no classification provided | curation | Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2) | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 10, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 27, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at