rs45531131

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_007078.3(LDB3):c.609G>A(p.Ser203Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00273 in 1,611,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 104 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 61 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 43 hom. )

Consequence

LDB3
NM_007078.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.00900

Variant links:

Genes affected

LDB3 (HGNC:15710): (LIM domain binding 3) This gene encodes a PDZ domain-containing protein. PDZ motifs are modular protein-protein interaction domains consisting of 80-120 amino acid residues. PDZ domain-containing proteins interact with each other in cytoskeletal assembly or with other proteins involved in targeting and clustering of membrane proteins. The protein encoded by this gene interacts with alpha-actinin-2 through its N-terminal PDZ domain and with protein kinase C via its C-terminal LIM domains. The LIM domain is a cysteine-rich motif defined by 50-60 amino acids containing two zinc-binding modules. This protein also interacts with all three members of the myozenin family. Mutations in this gene have been associated with myofibrillar myopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified; all isoforms have N-terminal PDZ domains while only longer isoforms (1, 2 and 5) have C-terminal LIM domains. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]

LDB3 links:

ENSG00000289258 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000289258 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 10-86681723-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86681723-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45550.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-86681723-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-86681723-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0143 (2183/152348) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0505 (2102/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0487. There are 61 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1024 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 2183 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LDB3	NM_007078.3 link	c.609G>A	p.Ser203Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 14	ENST00000361373.9	NP_009009.1	O75112-1
LDB3	NM_001368067.1 link	c.321+1566G>A		intron_variant	Intron 4 of 8	ENST00000263066.11	NP_001354996.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LDB3	ENST00000361373.9 link	c.609G>A	p.Ser203Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 14	1	NM_007078.3	ENSP00000355296.3	O75112-1
ENSG00000289258	ENST00000443292.2 link	c.2118G>A	p.Ser706Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 18	1		ENSP00000393132.2	C9JWU6
LDB3	ENST00000263066.11 link	c.321+1566G>A		intron_variant	Intron 4 of 8	1	NM_001368067.1	ENSP00000263066.7	O75112-6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0143

AC:

2174

AN:

152230

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0505

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00334

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000176

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00765

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00353

AC:

881

AN:

249662

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00248

AC XY:

335

AN XY:

135076

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0492

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00160

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000546

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000329

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000195

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00115

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00152

AC:

2214

AN:

1459310

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00120

AC XY:

870

AN XY:

725636

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0520

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00202

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000697

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000189

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000168

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00310

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0143

AC:

2183

AN:

152348

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0137

AC XY:

1024

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0505

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00333

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000176

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00757

Alfa

AF:

0.00604

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0161

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000327

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 10, 2008

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 25, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Apr 11, 2016

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Myofibrillar myopathy 4

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Sep 09, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.40

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.83

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.24

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_AG_spliceai

0.24

Position offset: 2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over