rs45545138

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000628.5(IL10RB):​c.442G>A​(p.Val148Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00111 in 1,613,568 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V148V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

IL10RB
NM_000628.5 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0580

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
IL10RB (HGNC:5965): (interleukin 10 receptor subunit beta) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the cytokine receptor family. It is an accessory chain essential for the active interleukin 10 receptor complex. Coexpression of this and IL10RA proteins has been shown to be required for IL10-induced signal transduction. This gene and three other interferon receptor genes, IFAR2, IFNAR1, and IFNGR2, form a class II cytokine receptor gene cluster located in a small region on chromosome 21. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
IL10RB Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • inflammatory bowel disease 25
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • IL10-related early-onset inflammatory bowel disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014973164).
BP6
Variant 21-33279862-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr21-33279862-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 537180.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00119 (182/152332) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00212 (144/68040). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00183. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 86 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
IL10RBNM_000628.5 linkc.442G>A p.Val148Met missense_variant Exon 4 of 7 ENST00000290200.7 NP_000619.3 Q08334

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
IL10RBENST00000290200.7 linkc.442G>A p.Val148Met missense_variant Exon 4 of 7 1 NM_000628.5 ENSP00000290200.2 Q08334
IFNAR2-IL10RBENST00000433395.7 linkc.1102G>A p.Val368Met missense_variant Exon 10 of 13 5 ENSP00000388223.3 H0Y3Z8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00120
AC:
182
AN:
152214
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00113
AC:
285
AN:
251430
AF XY:
0.00124
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000607
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00258
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00197
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00110
AC:
1603
AN:
1461236
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00109
AC XY:
794
AN XY:
726960
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000179
AC:
6
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000626
AC:
28
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00184
AC:
48
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39690
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000139
AC:
12
AN:
86238
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000374
AC:
2
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00260
AC:
15
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00129
AC:
1435
AN:
1111416
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000944
AC:
57
AN:
60380
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.467
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
82
165
247
330
412
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
40
80
120
160
200
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00119
AC:
182
AN:
152332
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00115
AC XY:
86
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000217
AC:
9
AN:
41566
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
16
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00212
AC:
144
AN:
68040
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00332
AC:
7
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13
25
38
50
63
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00193
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00126
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00130
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00198
AC:
17
ExAC
AF:
0.00113
AC:
137
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00327
EpiControl
AF:
0.00249

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Nov 01, 2021
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inflammatory bowel disease 25 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 28, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

IL10RB-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 28, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.20
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
CADD
Benign
3.9
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.083
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.88
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0066
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.81
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.011
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.69
N
PhyloP100
-0.058
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.0
N
REVEL
Benign
0.10
Sift
Uncertain
0.022
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.16
T
Polyphen
0.96
D
Vest4
0.035
MVP
0.20
MPC
0.54
ClinPred
0.063
T
GERP RS
-3.3
Varity_R
0.13
gMVP
0.37
Mutation Taster
=80/20
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45545138; hg19: chr21-34652167; API