rs4839469
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_138959.3(VANGL1):c.346G>A(p.Ala116Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.147 in 1,614,090 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18,427 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_138959.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neural tube defects, susceptibility toInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VANGL1 | NM_138959.3 | c.346G>A | p.Ala116Thr | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 8 | ENST00000355485.7 | NP_620409.1 | |
| VANGL1 | NM_001172412.2 | c.346G>A | p.Ala116Thr | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 8 | NP_001165883.1 | ||
| VANGL1 | NM_001172411.2 | c.340G>A | p.Ala114Thr | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 8 | NP_001165882.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VANGL1 | ENST00000355485.7 | c.346G>A | p.Ala116Thr | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 8 | 1 | NM_138959.3 | ENSP00000347672.2 | ||
| VANGL1 | ENST00000310260.7 | c.346G>A | p.Ala116Thr | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 8 | 1 | ENSP00000310800.3 | |||
| VANGL1 | ENST00000369509.1 | c.346G>A | p.Ala116Thr | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 7 | 1 | ENSP00000358522.1 | |||
| VANGL1 | ENST00000369510.8 | c.340G>A | p.Ala114Thr | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 8 | 1 | ENSP00000358523.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.127 AC: 19284AN: 152086Hom.: 1334 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.150 AC: 37847AN: 251486 AF XY: 0.147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.149 AC: 217427AN: 1461886Hom.: 17083 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.147 AC XY: 106864AN XY: 727244 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.127 AC: 19291AN: 152204Hom.: 1344 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.125 AC XY: 9293AN XY: 74426 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21085059) -
Neural tube defect Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Sacral defect with anterior meningocele Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at