rs5030135

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.216G>T(p.Gln72His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000443 in 1,521,024 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/14 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00041 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00045 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.00200

Variant links:

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

WT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0021917522).

BP6

Variant 11-32435145-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32435145-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 241479.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000447 (612/1368968) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00738 (34/4604). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00543. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 327 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 45. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 62 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6 link	c.216G>T	p.Gln72His	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 10	ENST00000452863.10	NP_077744.4	P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863.10 link	c.216G>T	p.Gln72His	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 10	1	NM_024426.6	ENSP00000415516.5		P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000408

AC:

AN:

151948

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000966

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00807

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00125

AC:

147

AN:

117694

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00117

AC XY:

AN XY:

65010

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000343

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0134

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000471

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000190

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000569

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00137

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000447

AC:

612

AN:

1368968

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000484

AC XY:

327

AN XY:

675272

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000102

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000434

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0125

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000347

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000898

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000150

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000408

AC:

AN:

152056

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000296

AC XY:

AN XY:

74340

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000963

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00807

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00237

Alfa

AF:

0.00191

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000525

ExAC

AF:

0.000474

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000291

AC:

AN:

3456

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:18

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Wilms tumor 1

Benign:4

Sep 02, 2015

Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 21, 2019

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

not provided

Benign:3

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Feb 25, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28873162, 27745835) -

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

WT1: BS1, BS2 -

not specified

Benign:2

Apr 11, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: WT1 c.216G>T (p.Gln72His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of four in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 117694 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 133 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in WT1 causing Wilms Tumor, Type 1 phenotype (9.4e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.216G>T in individuals affected with Wilms Tumor, Type 1 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Dec 19, 2018

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Meacham syndrome

Benign:2

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 21, 2019

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4

Benign:2

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 21, 2019

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1

Benign:1

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Nov 18, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Frasier syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Drash syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

WT1-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 05, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.62

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.78

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.76

Eigen

Benign

-1.9

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.9

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.34

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0022

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.93

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.88

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.81

N;N;N;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.054

Sift

Benign

0.30

T;T;T;.;.;.

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0030

D;D;D;.;.;.

Vest4

0.053

MutPred

0.13

Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.1111);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.1111);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.1111);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.1111);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.1111);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.1111);

MVP

0.13

ClinPred

0.0029

GERP RS

-1.8

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over