rs528541334
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_024675.4(PALB2):c.899C>T(p.Thr300Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 1,614,068 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024675.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | NM_024675.4 | c.899C>T | p.Thr300Ile | missense_variant | 4/13 | ENST00000261584.9 | NP_078951.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALB2 | ENST00000261584.9 | c.899C>T | p.Thr300Ile | missense_variant | 4/13 | 1 | NM_024675.4 | ENSP00000261584 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000430 AC: 108AN: 251326Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000559 AC XY: 76AN XY: 135856
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000166 AC: 242AN: 1461770Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000241 AC XY: 175AN XY: 727188
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152298Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | case-control | Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre | Jun 01, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Nov 24, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 31, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 07, 2023 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Oct 14, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 17, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 27, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 28, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 10, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23977390, 24728327, 21113654, 26283626, 30309218, 31636395) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 19, 2020 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PALB2 p.Thr300Ile variant was identified in 3 of 2516 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast cancer (Ding 2011, Phuah 2013, Thompson 2015). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs528541334) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, in ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae; classified as likely benign by GeneDx; classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, Counsyl, PALB2 database, CGLPMCCC), Clinvitae, and LOVD 3.0. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, or the Zhejiang University Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 110 of 277114 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 24030 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), Other in 1 of 6462 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 1 of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), East Asian in 1 of 18868 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 106 of 30778 chromosomes (freq: 0.003); it was not observed in the European, Ashkenazi Jewish, or Finnish populations. The p.Thr300 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at