rs5316

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000497.4(CYP11B1):​c.1353T>C​(p.Leu451Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00224 in 1,613,464 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 28 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 30 hom. )

Consequence

CYP11B1
NM_000497.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.40

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CYP11B1 (HGNC:2591): (cytochrome P450 family 11 subfamily B member 1) This gene encodes a member of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes. The cytochrome P450 proteins are monooxygenases which catalyze many reactions involved in drug metabolism and synthesis of cholesterol, steroids and other lipids. This protein localizes to the mitochondrial inner membrane and is involved in the conversion of progesterone to cortisol in the adrenal cortex. Mutations in this gene cause congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 11-beta-hydroxylase deficiency. Transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
GML (HGNC:4375): (glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchored molecule like) Predicted to be involved in DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrest; apoptotic process; and negative regulation of cell population proliferation. Predicted to be extrinsic component of membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 8-142875002-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-142875002-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 362147.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.4 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0114 (1732/151974) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0392 (1617/41246). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0376. There are 28 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 797 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 28 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CYP11B1NM_000497.4 linkc.1353T>C p.Leu451Leu synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 9 ENST00000292427.10 NP_000488.3 P15538-1Q8TDD0
CYP11B1NM_001026213.1 linkc.1200+232T>C intron_variant Intron 7 of 7 NP_001021384.1 P15538-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CYP11B1ENST00000292427.10 linkc.1353T>C p.Leu451Leu synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 9 1 NM_000497.4 ENSP00000292427.5 P15538-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0113
AC:
1721
AN:
151856
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0391
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00505
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00815
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00308
AC:
773
AN:
251322
AF XY:
0.00230
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0407
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000167
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00277
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00128
AC:
1877
AN:
1461490
Hom.:
30
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00110
AC XY:
802
AN XY:
727084
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0419
AC:
1395
AN:
33272
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00273
AC:
122
AN:
44698
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000139
AC:
12
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53408
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00209
AC:
12
AN:
5748
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000145
AC:
161
AN:
1111894
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00290
AC:
175
AN:
60378
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.466
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
123
246
370
493
616
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
48
96
144
192
240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0114
AC:
1732
AN:
151974
Hom.:
28
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0107
AC XY:
797
AN XY:
74314
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0392
AC:
1617
AN:
41246
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00504
AC:
77
AN:
15282
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000279
AC:
19
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00806
AC:
17
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
89
178
267
356
445
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00677
Hom.:
7
Bravo
AF:
0.0132
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:1
Nov 06, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Deficiency of steroid 11-beta-monooxygenase Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
4.6
DANN
Benign
0.66
PhyloP100
-1.4
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5316; hg19: chr8-143956418; API