Menu
GeneBe

rs536900412

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001378120.1(MBD5):c.1111C>G(p.Gln371Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000727 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00045 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00076 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

MBD5
NM_001378120.1 missense

Scores

3
4
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.62
Variant links:
Genes affected
MBD5 (HGNC:20444): (methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5) This gene encodes a member of the methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) family. The MBD consists of about 70 residues and is the minimal region required for a methyl-CpG-binding protein binding specifically to methylated DNA. In addition to the MBD domain, this protein contains a PWWP domain (Pro-Trp-Trp-Pro motif), which consists of 100-150 amino acids and is found in numerous proteins that are involved in cell division, growth and differentiation. Mutations in this gene cause an autosomal dominant type of cognitive disability. The encoded protein interacts with the polycomb repressive complex PR-DUB which catalyzes the deubiquitination of a lysine residue of histone 2A. Haploinsufficiency of this gene is associated with a syndrome involving microcephaly, intellectual disabilities, severe speech impairment, and seizures. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found, but their full-length nature is not determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006460339).
BP6
Variant 2-148469054-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-148469054-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 206068.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-148469054-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000447 (68/152166) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0141 (68/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0114. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 58 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 68 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MBD5NM_001378120.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1111C>G p.Gln371Glu missense_variant 8/14 ENST00000642680.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MBD5ENST00000642680.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1111C>G p.Gln371Glu missense_variant 8/14 NM_001378120.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000447
AC:
68
AN:
152048
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00156
AC:
392
AN:
251040
Hom.:
6
AF XY:
0.00210
AC XY:
285
AN XY:
135646
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0126
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000882
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000653
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000757
AC:
1106
AN:
1461784
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00107
AC XY:
779
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000540
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000762
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000447
AC:
68
AN:
152166
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000780
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000128
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000756
ExAC
AF:
0.00182
AC:
221
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00433
AC:
15
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 23, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 16, 2017- -
Intellectual Disability, Dominant Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 19, 2024- -
MBD5-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 13, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 10, 2017This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2024MBD5: BS1, BS2 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
Cadd
Uncertain
23
Dann
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.081
T;.;.;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.61
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.67
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0065
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.97
L;.;.;L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.62
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.2
N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.20
T;.;.;T;T
Polyphen
0.97
D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.55
MutPred
0.076
Loss of sheet (P = 0.1501);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1501);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1501);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1501);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1501);
MVP
0.28
MPC
0.20
ClinPred
0.17
T
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.47
gMVP
0.32

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs536900412; hg19: chr2-149226623; API