rs536900412

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001378120.1(MBD5):​c.1111C>G​(p.Gln371Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000727 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00045 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00076 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

MBD5
NM_001378120.1 missense

Scores

3
4
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.62

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MBD5 (HGNC:20444): (methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5) This gene encodes a member of the methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) family. The MBD consists of about 70 residues and is the minimal region required for a methyl-CpG-binding protein binding specifically to methylated DNA. In addition to the MBD domain, this protein contains a PWWP domain (Pro-Trp-Trp-Pro motif), which consists of 100-150 amino acids and is found in numerous proteins that are involved in cell division, growth and differentiation. Mutations in this gene cause an autosomal dominant type of cognitive disability. The encoded protein interacts with the polycomb repressive complex PR-DUB which catalyzes the deubiquitination of a lysine residue of histone 2A. Haploinsufficiency of this gene is associated with a syndrome involving microcephaly, intellectual disabilities, severe speech impairment, and seizures. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found, but their full-length nature is not determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]
MBD5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • complex neurodevelopmental disorder
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006460339).
BP6
Variant 2-148469054-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-148469054-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 206068.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000447 (68/152166) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0141 (68/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0114. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 58 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 68 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MBD5NM_001378120.1 linkc.1111C>G p.Gln371Glu missense_variant Exon 8 of 14 ENST00000642680.2 NP_001365049.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MBD5ENST00000642680.2 linkc.1111C>G p.Gln371Glu missense_variant Exon 8 of 14 NM_001378120.1 ENSP00000493871.2 A0A2R8YDL9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000447
AC:
68
AN:
152048
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00156
AC:
392
AN:
251040
AF XY:
0.00210
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000882
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000653
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000757
AC:
1106
AN:
1461784
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00107
AC XY:
779
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000299
AC:
1
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000224
AC:
1
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39694
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0122
AC:
1051
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000173
AC:
1
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000540
AC:
6
AN:
1111938
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000762
AC:
46
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
105
210
316
421
526
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000447
AC:
68
AN:
152166
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000780
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41510
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0141
AC:
68
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
10
13
16
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000128
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000756
ExAC
AF:
0.00182
AC:
221
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00433
AC:
15
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Feb 16, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 23, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Intellectual Disability, Dominant Uncertain:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 1 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

MBD5-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 13, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Feb 10, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Benign:1
Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MBD5: BS1, BS2 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.081
T;.;.;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.61
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.67
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0065
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.97
L;.;.;L;.
PhyloP100
7.6
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.62
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.2
N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.20
T;.;.;T;T
Polyphen
0.97
D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.55
MutPred
0.076
Loss of sheet (P = 0.1501);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1501);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1501);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1501);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1501);
MVP
0.28
MPC
0.20
ClinPred
0.17
T
GERP RS
5.5
PromoterAI
-0.013
Neutral
Varity_R
0.47
gMVP
0.32
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs536900412; hg19: chr2-149226623; API