rs5498
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BA1
The ENST00000592893.1(LIMASI):n.102T>C variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.423 in 1,613,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 148,506 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000592893.1 non_coding_transcript_exon
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICAM1 | NM_000201.3 | c.1405A>G | p.Lys469Glu | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 7 | ENST00000264832.8 | NP_000192.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICAM1 | ENST00000264832.8 | c.1405A>G | p.Lys469Glu | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 7 | 1 | NM_000201.3 | ENSP00000264832.2 | ||
ICAM1 | ENST00000423829.2 | c.739A>G | p.Lys247Glu | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 5 | 2 | ENSP00000413124.2 | |||
LIMASI | ENST00000592893.1 | n.102T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 3 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.372 AC: 56534AN: 151900Hom.: 11683 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.438 AC: 109733AN: 250628Hom.: 25472 AF XY: 0.442 AC XY: 59930AN XY: 135520
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.429 AC: 626242AN: 1461044Hom.: 136824 Cov.: 53 AF XY: 0.431 AC XY: 313016AN XY: 726776
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.372 AC: 56537AN: 152018Hom.: 11682 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.376 AC XY: 27951AN XY: 74290
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
ICAM1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at