rs551747882

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_000321.3(RB1):c.2003G>A(p.Arg668His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000644 in 1,613,824 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R668S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000066 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RB1
NM_000321.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.08

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RB1 (HGNC:9884): (RB transcriptional corepressor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a negative regulator of the cell cycle and was the first tumor suppressor gene found. The encoded protein also stabilizes constitutive heterochromatin to maintain the overall chromatin structure. The active, hypophosphorylated form of the protein binds transcription factor E2F1. Defects in this gene are a cause of childhood cancer retinoblastoma (RB), bladder cancer, and osteogenic sarcoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

RB1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

hereditary retinoblastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P, Ambry Genetics
retinoblastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
melanoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

RB1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

PM1

In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 2 benign, 24 uncertain in NM_000321.3

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.17161554).

BP6

Variant 13-48459730-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-48459730-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 312292.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RB1	NM_000321.3 link	c.2003G>A	p.Arg668His	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 27	ENST00000267163.6	NP_000312.2
RB1	NM_001407165.1 link	c.2003G>A	p.Arg668His	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 27		NP_001394094.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RB1	ENST00000267163.6 link	c.2003G>A	p.Arg668His	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 27	1	NM_000321.3	ENSP00000267163.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000527

AC:

AN:

151888

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000477

AC:

AN:

251490

AF XY:

0.0000368

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000791

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000657

AC:

AN:

1461820

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000495

AC XY:

AN XY:

727214

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000504

AC:

AN:

39694

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000791

AC:

AN:

1111956

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000662

AC:

AN:

60390

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.466

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000526

AC:

AN:

152004

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000673

AC XY:

AN XY:

74298

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41430

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15284

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5164

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4816

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10542

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000103

AC:

AN:

67988

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2104

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.544

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000832

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000378

ExAC

AF:

0.0000412

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinoblastoma

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 21, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Aug 26, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: RB1 c.2003G>A (p.Arg668His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Retinoblastoma-associated protein, B-box domain (IPR002719) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.8e-05 in 251490 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 1 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RB1 causing Retinoblastoma phenotype (4.2e-05). To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2003G>A in individuals affected with Retinoblastoma and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 312292). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

not provided

Benign:1

Mar 27, 2023

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Sep 02, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.087

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.11

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.21

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.77

D;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.019

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.17

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.90

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.88

D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.034

MetaRNN

Benign

0.17

T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.0041

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.3

L;.

PhyloP100

4.1

PrimateAI

Benign

0.47

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.7

N;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.34

Sift

Benign

0.082

T;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.58

T;.

Polyphen

0.031

B;.

Vest4

0.23

MVP

0.79

MPC

0.56

ClinPred

0.058

GERP RS

5.7

Varity_R

0.12

gMVP

0.35

Mutation Taster

=59/41

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over