rs55775473
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9634G>A(p.Gly3212Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Likely benign in ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G3212E) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- Fanconi anemia complementation group D1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- sarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- medulloblastomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.9634G>A | p.Gly3212Arg | missense_variant | Exon 26 of 27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.9265G>A | p.Gly3089Arg | missense_variant | Exon 26 of 27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1692G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 25 of 26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 | ||||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1692G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 25 of 26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251338 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461736Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727186 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
- -
Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.9634G>A (p.Gly3212Arg) variant causes a missense change involving a conserved nucleotide with 3/5 in silico tools predicting a benign outcome, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was not found in controls (ExAC, 1000 Gs, or ESP). However, it should be noted another variant, c.9634G>C (scored NV) causing the same missense change was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 62/121384, along with being reported in one database to co-occur with multiple deleterious BRCA2 variants and multiple clinical laboratories via ClinVar citing the variant as "benign/likely benign." The variant of interest, to our knowledge, has not been reported in reputable databases/clinical laboratories. Therefore, taking all available lines of evidence into consideration, the variant of interest is classified as a "VUS-possibly benign." -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at