rs55817813

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The ENST00000288135.6(KIT):c.2622G>A(p.Pro874=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00236 in 1,614,044 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P874P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0024 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

KIT
ENST00000288135.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.79

Variant links:

Genes affected

KIT (HGNC:6342): (KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase. This gene was initially identified as a homolog of the feline sarcoma viral oncogene v-kit and is often referred to as proto-oncogene c-Kit. The canonical form of this glycosylated transmembrane protein has an N-terminal extracellular region with five immunoglobulin-like domains, a transmembrane region, and an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain at the C-terminus. Upon activation by its cytokine ligand, stem cell factor (SCF), this protein phosphorylates multiple intracellular proteins that play a role in in the proliferation, differentiation, migration and apoptosis of many cell types and thereby plays an important role in hematopoiesis, stem cell maintenance, gametogenesis, melanogenesis, and in mast cell development, migration and function. This protein can be a membrane-bound or soluble protein. Mutations in this gene are associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, mast cell disease, acute myelogenous leukemia, and piebaldism. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

KIT links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).

BP6

Variant 4-54736746-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54736746-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 220917.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=5, Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr4-54736746-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.79 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 251 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KIT	NM_000222.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.2622G>A	p.Pro874=	synonymous_variant	19/21	ENST00000288135.6	NP_000213.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
KIT	ENST00000288135.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.2622G>A	p.Pro874=	synonymous_variant	19/21	1	NM_000222.3	ENSP00000288135	P4	P10721-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00165

AC:

251

AN:

152096

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00170

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000830

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000661

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00285

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00288

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00174

AC:

436

AN:

251134

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00166

AC XY:

225

AN XY:

135708

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00189

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00249

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00375

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00243

AC:

3557

AN:

1461830

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00244

AC XY:

1775

AN XY:

727216

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00136

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00137

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00219

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00279

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00233

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00165

AC:

251

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00149

AC XY:

111

AN XY:

74426

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000337

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00170

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000831

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000661

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00285

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00285

Alfa

AF:

0.00218

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00162

EpiCase

AF:

0.00278

EpiControl

AF:

0.00261

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:5

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Nov 01, 2024	KIT: BP4, BP7, BS1 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen	-	- -

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Apr 27, 2017	This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Feb 01, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center	Jul 07, 2023	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	May 20, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Jun 06, 2023	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Piebaldism

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Mastocytosis

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.85

CADD

Benign

0.042

DANN

Benign

0.49

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over