rs55977008

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.7150C>A​(p.Gln2384Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000318 in 1,613,760 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q2384R) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:30O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.239
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005673617).
BP6
Variant 13-32355003-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32355003-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 38086.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32355003-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.7150C>A p.Gln2384Lys missense_variant 14/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.7150C>A p.Gln2384Lys missense_variant 14/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00181
AC:
275
AN:
152158
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00635
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000590
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000370
AC:
93
AN:
251210
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000317
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
135762
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00511
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000232
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000161
AC:
235
AN:
1461484
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000139
AC XY:
101
AN XY:
727070
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00556
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000291
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000360
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000464
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00183
AC:
278
AN:
152276
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00177
AC XY:
132
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00640
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.000297
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00230
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00545
AC:
24
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000428
AC:
52
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:30Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Feb 13, 2007- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylMar 20, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganNov 03, 2014- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000000334 -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPathway GenomicsOct 30, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 23, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
not specified Benign:7Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJul 23, 2021- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.5% (49/10380) African; ClinVar: 6 B/LB, 2 VUS -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 25, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalFeb 06, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 11, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Feb 14, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaNov 30, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthSep 30, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Sep 16, 2020- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJun 29, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingFoulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research-- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 15, 2019- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicMay 19, 2017- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 23, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonJun 01, 2014- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Gln2384Lys variant was identified in 3 of 4340 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast cancer and was not identified in 280 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Fackenthal 2005, Gao 2000, Borg 2010). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs55977008) “With other allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.001 (1000 Genomes Project), and the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server) in 24 of 4406 African American (frequency 0.005) and 0 of 8600 European American alleles; this variant was identified in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Oct 20th, 2014) 49 of 10380 African, 2 of 11578 latino and 1 of "other" individuals and it was not found in European, European (Non-Finnish), South Asian and East Asian individuals, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The variant was also identified in GeneInsight as unclassified by a clinical laboratory within the Canadian Open Genetics Repository, HGMD, LOVD (predicted neutral, non-pathogenic or of no clinical significance), the BIC database (31X with unknown clinical importance and UMD (6X as a neutral variant and also found co-occurring with silent variant, c.4071A>C (p.Leu1357Leu). The variant was submitted to the ClinVar database by multiple submitters: classified as benign variant by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) (submitted within the ClinVar database and derived from Myriad reports) and Ambry Genetics; uncertain significance by BIC and likely benign by Counsyl and by Invitae; classification was not provided by ITMI. The p.Gln2384 residue is not conserved in mammals and lower organisms and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The p.Gln2384Lys variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant was also identified with high frequency in Algerian and African American breast cancer patients with family history, and BRCA1/2 mutation negative (Cherbal 2012, Nanda 2005). Using a posterior probablility model based on several sources of information for the purpose of VUS classification, the variant was classified as not pathogenic (Lindor 2011). In addition, the variant was found in a patient with uterine serous carcinoma but was not considered a deleterious mutation (Pennington 2013). The variant was identified with a co-occurring BRCA1 pathogenic variant in an individual tested by our lab, increasing the likelihood that this variant is benign. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.054
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.45
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
0.066
DANN
Benign
0.16
Eigen
Benign
-1.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.5
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0039
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.034
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0057
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.88
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.21
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.0
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T
Vest4
0.10
MVP
0.76
MPC
0.021
ClinPred
0.00034
T
GERP RS
-4.0
gMVP
0.23

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55977008; hg19: chr13-32929140; API