rs55977008
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7150C>A(p.Gln2384Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000318 in 1,613,760 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q2384R) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.7150C>A | p.Gln2384Lys | missense_variant | 14/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.7150C>A | p.Gln2384Lys | missense_variant | 14/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00181 AC: 275AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000370 AC: 93AN: 251210Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000317 AC XY: 43AN XY: 135762
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000161 AC: 235AN: 1461484Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000139 AC XY: 101AN XY: 727070
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00183 AC: 278AN: 152276Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00177 AC XY: 132AN XY: 74460
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Feb 13, 2007 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Mar 20, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Nov 03, 2014 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000000334 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pathway Genomics | Oct 30, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 23, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:7Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 23, 2021 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.5% (49/10380) African; ClinVar: 6 B/LB, 2 VUS - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 25, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Feb 06, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 11, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Feb 14, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Nov 30, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer | Nov 01, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 30, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jun 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 15, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | May 19, 2017 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 23, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jun 01, 2014 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.Gln2384Lys variant was identified in 3 of 4340 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast cancer and was not identified in 280 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Fackenthal 2005, Gao 2000, Borg 2010). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs55977008) “With other allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.001 (1000 Genomes Project), and the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server) in 24 of 4406 African American (frequency 0.005) and 0 of 8600 European American alleles; this variant was identified in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Oct 20th, 2014) 49 of 10380 African, 2 of 11578 latino and 1 of "other" individuals and it was not found in European, European (Non-Finnish), South Asian and East Asian individuals, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The variant was also identified in GeneInsight as unclassified by a clinical laboratory within the Canadian Open Genetics Repository, HGMD, LOVD (predicted neutral, non-pathogenic or of no clinical significance), the BIC database (31X with unknown clinical importance and UMD (6X as a neutral variant and also found co-occurring with silent variant, c.4071A>C (p.Leu1357Leu). The variant was submitted to the ClinVar database by multiple submitters: classified as benign variant by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) (submitted within the ClinVar database and derived from Myriad reports) and Ambry Genetics; uncertain significance by BIC and likely benign by Counsyl and by Invitae; classification was not provided by ITMI. The p.Gln2384 residue is not conserved in mammals and lower organisms and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The p.Gln2384Lys variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant was also identified with high frequency in Algerian and African American breast cancer patients with family history, and BRCA1/2 mutation negative (Cherbal 2012, Nanda 2005). Using a posterior probablility model based on several sources of information for the purpose of VUS classification, the variant was classified as not pathogenic (Lindor 2011). In addition, the variant was found in a patient with uterine serous carcinoma but was not considered a deleterious mutation (Pennington 2013). The variant was identified with a co-occurring BRCA1 pathogenic variant in an individual tested by our lab, increasing the likelihood that this variant is benign. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at