rs56136489
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.14753C>T(p.Thr4918Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00144 in 1,614,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T4918K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_206933.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USH2A | ENST00000307340.8 | c.14753C>T | p.Thr4918Met | missense_variant | Exon 67 of 72 | 1 | NM_206933.4 | ENSP00000305941.3 | ||
USH2A | ENST00000674083.1 | c.14753C>T | p.Thr4918Met | missense_variant | Exon 67 of 73 | ENSP00000501296.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00134 AC: 204AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00110 AC: 277AN: 251328Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00104 AC XY: 141AN XY: 135840
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00145 AC: 2122AN: 1461850Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00145 AC XY: 1054AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00134 AC: 204AN: 152250Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00150 AC XY: 112AN XY: 74432
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:5Benign:2
The USH2A c.14753C>T; p.Thr4918Met variant (rs56136489) is reported in the literature in an individual affected with Usher syndrome type 2, although it was not demonstrated to be disease-causing and a second variant in this individual was not reported (McGee 2010). This variant is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.12% (331/282718 alleles, including one homozygote) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The threonine at codon 4918 is moderately conserved and computational analyses (SIFT, PolyPhen-2) predict that this variant is deleterious. However, due to limited information, the clinical significance of the p.Thr4918Met variant is uncertain at this time. References: McGee TL et al. Novel mutations in the long isoform of the USH2A gene in patients with Usher syndrome type II or non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa. J Med Genet. 2010 Jul;47(7):499-506. -
USH2A: BP4, BS2 -
- -
- -
- -
Identified in a patient with Usher syndrome type II in published literature, however no information about a second variant was provided (McGee et al., 2010); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32707200, 24944099, 20507924) -
- -
Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1
- -
not specified Benign:1
p.Thr4918Met in exon 67 of USH2A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.2% (119/66710) of European chro mosomes, including 1 homozygous individual, by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs56136489). Threonine (Thr) at pos ition 4918 is not conserved in mammals or evolutionarily distant species and 1 m ammal (Pacific walrus) carries a methionine (Met) at this position, suggesting t his change may be tolerated. Additional computational prediction tools do not pr ovide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. Although this vari ant has been reported in one individual with Usher syndrome type II, the authors classified it as a variant of uncertain significance and did not clarify whethe r a second USH2A variant was found in the individual (McGee 2010). -
Usher syndrome type 2A Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at