rs56157628
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5879G>A(p.Cys1960Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000626 in 1,613,870 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C1960G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.5879G>A | p.Cys1960Tyr | missense_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.5879G>A | p.Cys1960Tyr | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000407 AC: 62AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000996 AC: 25AN: 250954Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000663 AC XY: 9AN XY: 135786
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000267 AC: 39AN: 1461692Hom.: 0 Cov.: 46 AF XY: 0.0000193 AC XY: 14AN XY: 727152
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000407 AC: 62AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000377 AC XY: 28AN XY: 74342
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 01, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 28, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 04, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Feb 06, 2024 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Dec 01, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Feb 20, 2004 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | May 01, 2012 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 26, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 21, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 15, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 07, 2017 | Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.5879G>A (p.Cys1960Tyr) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant is located outside of any know functional domain or repeat and 3/5 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 17/120980 control chromosomes of ExAC, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.001587 (16/10082). This frequency is about 2 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (0.0007503), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. The variant is present in a control population dataset of gnomAD at a frequency of 0.0001372 (38/277020 chrs), mainly in individuals of African origin: 0.0015 (36/24015 chrs, including 7 homozygotes). This data support the speculation that the variant of interest may be an ethnic-specific functional polymorphism. The variant has been reported in affected individuals via publications with limited information (no co-occurrence or co-segregation information provided). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Furthermore, ClinVar - SCRP (RCV000031584.4) cites the variant to co-occur with pathogenic BRCA1 variants, 3555del4 and IVS23+1G>A. In addition, the variant was identified to co-occure with a known pathogenic variant in BRCA1 c.4357+1G>A/IVS12+1G>T, further supporting the non-pathogenic role of c.58769G>A variant. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at