rs56225585

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000214.3(JAG1):​c.2382C>T​(p.Ser794Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0163 in 1,613,512 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,124 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.082 ( 1626 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0095 ( 1498 hom. )

Consequence

JAG1
NM_000214.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.337

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
JAG1 (HGNC:6188): (jagged canonical Notch ligand 1) The jagged 1 protein encoded by JAG1 is the human homolog of the Drosophilia jagged protein. Human jagged 1 is the ligand for the receptor notch 1, the latter is involved in signaling processes. Mutations that alter the jagged 1 protein cause Alagille syndrome. Jagged 1 signalling through notch 1 has also been shown to play a role in hematopoiesis. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2019]
JAG1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Alagille syndrome due to a JAG1 point mutation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, axonal, Type 2HH
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • tetralogy of fallot
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 20-10643854-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-10643854-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 42474.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.337 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.276 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000214.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
JAG1
NM_000214.3
MANE Select
c.2382C>Tp.Ser794Ser
synonymous
Exon 20 of 26NP_000205.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
JAG1
ENST00000254958.10
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.2382C>Tp.Ser794Ser
synonymous
Exon 20 of 26ENSP00000254958.4
JAG1
ENST00000423891.6
TSL:2
n.2248C>T
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 18 of 25
JAG1
ENST00000617965.2
TSL:5
n.2971C>T
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 14 of 17

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0821
AC:
12479
AN:
151956
Hom.:
1622
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.280
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0391
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00198
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0380
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0703
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0230
AC:
5763
AN:
251072
AF XY:
0.0169
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.294
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00227
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00218
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0145
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00949
AC:
13875
AN:
1461438
Hom.:
1498
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00828
AC XY:
6022
AN XY:
727004
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.287
AC:
9592
AN:
33418
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0183
AC:
818
AN:
44702
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00111
AC:
29
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00121
AC:
104
AN:
86190
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00165
AC:
88
AN:
53404
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0193
AC:
111
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00166
AC:
1850
AN:
1111754
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
1283
AN:
60376
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.457
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
600
1200
1799
2399
2999
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
302
604
906
1208
1510
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0822
AC:
12504
AN:
152074
Hom.:
1626
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0796
AC XY:
5922
AN XY:
74354
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.280
AC:
11585
AN:
41400
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0390
AC:
597
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000194
AC:
1
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00249
AC:
12
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00198
AC:
21
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0408
AC:
12
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00188
AC:
128
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0695
AC:
147
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
460
919
1379
1838
2298
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
108
216
324
432
540
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0327
Hom.:
437
Bravo
AF:
0.0937
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0180
AC:
64
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Apr 10, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 09, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Isolated Nonsyndromic Congenital Heart Disease Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Alagille syndrome due to a JAG1 point mutation Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:1
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Aug 04, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
8.6
DANN
Benign
0.74
PhyloP100
-0.34
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56225585; hg19: chr20-10624502; API