Menu
GeneBe

rs56403624

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.1385A>G​(p.Glu462Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000246 in 1,611,804 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E462D) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

1
15

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:24

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.22
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.12106818).
BP6
Variant 13-32332863-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32332863-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37738.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32332863-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1385A>G p.Glu462Gly missense_variant 10/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1385A>G p.Glu462Gly missense_variant 10/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000184
AC:
28
AN:
152256
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000723
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000246
AC:
61
AN:
248384
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000275
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
134302
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000621
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000278
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000479
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000252
AC:
368
AN:
1459548
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000251
AC XY:
182
AN XY:
725902
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000300
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000226
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000469
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000302
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000216
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000184
AC:
28
AN:
152256
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000202
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74390
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000723
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000345
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000162
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000239
AC:
29
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:24
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 13, 2014- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Multiple publications classify as VUS/not pathogenic; ExAC: 27/66408 European chromosomes -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Glu462Gly variant was identified in 16 of 5462 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from individuals with breast or ovarian cancer and was absent in 200 control chromosomes from theses studies (Capanu 2011, Farrugia 2008, Hadjisavvas 2003, Hadjisavvas 2004, Simard 2007, van Harssel 2010); however, an insufficient number of controls were included in these studies to determine the frequency of this variant in the general population. The variant was also reported in HGMD, LOVD, UMD (14X as a neutral variant), and the BIC database (37X with unknown clinical importance). This variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs56403624) “With non-pathogenic allele”, and at a low frequency (0.0003) in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project. This residue is conserved in mammals but not in lower organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. Functional assays assessing cell survival, homologous recombination, centrosome regulation and nuclear localization have found no effect of the variant on normal BRCA2 function (Farrugia 2008, Wu 2005). In addition, five in silico studies predict this variant to be neutral or of little clinical significance (Capanu 2011 21520273, Easton 2007, Farrugia 2008, Lindor 2012, van Harssel 2010). This variant was not found to co-segregate with disease in an assessment of four families (Mohammadi 2009), and Simard (2007) found this variant co-occurring with a known deleterious mutation, increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have functional importance. Furthermore, Myriad classifies this variant as a polymorphism (personal communication). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJun 16, 2021DNA sequence analysis of the BRCA2 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.1385A>G, in exon 10 that results in an amino acid change, p.Glu462Gly. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.043% in the European sub-population (dbSNP rs56403624). The p.Glu462Gly change was reported to co-occur with a pathogenic sequence change in the BRCA2 gene (PMID: 16905680). In addition, this variant was found not to segregate with disease in affected families (PMID: 19200354). The p. Glu462Gly change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the BRCA2 protein that is known to be functional. In-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL) provide contradictory results for the p.Glu462Gly change. Functional studies reported that this sequence change demonstrates similar protein function to the wild-type allele in assays of cellular survival and viability, homologous recombination repair and genome stability (PMID: 15695382). These collective evidences indicate that this is a likely benign sequence change. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Sep 07, 2006- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000293 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylJul 10, 2014- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingVantari GeneticsJan 06, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 05, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Dec 17, 2020- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 19, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10717622, 24504028, 15026808, 21952622, 21520273, 24323938, 19200354, 15172753, 20104584, 19491284, 18451181, 21990134, 17924331, 15695382, 19563646, 16905680, 27616075, 29036293, 32444794) -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicApr 14, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2023BRCA2: BP1, BP4, BS3:Supporting, BS4 -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 20, 2015Variant Summary: The c.1385A>G variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide and 2/5 in silico tools predict a benign outcome. The variant was observed in the large and broad cohorts of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.023%, primarily observed in the European (Non-Finnish) cohort at a frequency of 0.041%. These frequencies do not exceed the maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 (0.075%). The variant was reported in the literature and databases in individuals who also have pathogenic BRCA1 (n=1) and BRCA2 (n=3) mutations (UMD, BIC, Simard_2007) suggesting a benign nature of the variant. Additionally, the variant was found to not segregate with disease in families tested (3 affected family members did not carry the variant; Gomez Garcia_2009). Functional studies showed the variant performed similarly to wild-type BRCA2 in assays of cellular survival and viability, homologous recombination repair, and genome instability (Wu_2005). Multiple reputable databases and clinical labs all classify the variant as benign/likely benign (Emory Genteics, UMD, ARUP, Ambry Genetics, SCRP, GeneDx, Counsyl) along with publications using multifactorial probability based models (Lindor_2012, Gomez Garcia_2009). All data, including co-segregation, functional assays, co-occurrence and the occurrence of this variant in the control population all support the classification of benign, therefore this variant has been classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.092
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.31
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Benign
0.0072
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.15
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.31
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.074
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.12
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.0
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Benign
0.067
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.064
T;T
Vest4
0.23
MVP
0.90
MPC
0.022
ClinPred
0.064
T
GERP RS
5.3
gMVP
0.26

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56403624; hg19: chr13-32907000; COSMIC: COSV66464441; API