rs564202359

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001277115.2(DNAH11):c.4491G>A(p.Glu1497Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000482 in 1,584,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH11
NM_001277115.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.118

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAH11 (HGNC:2942): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 11) This gene encodes a ciliary outer dynein arm protein and is a member of the dynein heavy chain family. It is a microtubule-dependent motor ATPase and has been reported to be involved in the movement of respiratory cilia. Mutations in this gene have been implicated in causing Kartagener Syndrome (a combination of situs inversus totalis and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD), also called Immotile Cilia Syndrome 1 (ICS1)) and male sterility. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2013]

DNAH11 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

primary ciliary dyskinesia 7
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
primary ciliary dyskinesia
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

DNAH11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).

BP6

Variant 7-21620069-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-21620069-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 257897.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.118 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000237 (36/152192) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0075 (36/4800). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00557. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 28 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 12 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH11	NM_001277115.2 link	c.4491G>A	p.Glu1497Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 25 of 82	ENST00000409508.8	NP_001264044.1	Q96DT5Q96NT7H9NAJ8H9NAJ7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNAH11	ENST00000409508.8 link	c.4491G>A	p.Glu1497Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 25 of 82	5	NM_001277115.2	ENSP00000475939.1		Q96DT5
DNAH11	ENST00000465593.1 link	n.517G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 3 of 4	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000237

AC:

AN:

152074

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00749

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00104

AC:

234

AN:

224728

AF XY:

0.00132

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000565

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000734

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000508

AC:

728

AN:

1432794

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000721

AC XY:

513

AN XY:

711326

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

31826

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

37560

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25224

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000256

AC:

AN:

39008

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00826

AC:

652

AN:

78946

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53142

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000176

AC:

AN:

5684

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000309

AC:

AN:

1102088

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000674

AC:

AN:

59316

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

129

161

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000237

AC:

AN:

152192

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000376

AC XY:

AN XY:

74398

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41522

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15284

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00750

AC:

AN:

4800

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10596

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000825

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000604

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00462

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 7

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Nov 23, 2020

Al Jalila Children’s Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality Hospital

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:2

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:1

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Jul 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

DNAH11: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.61

CADD

Benign

5.8

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.34

PhyloP100

-0.12

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over