rs564202359

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001277115.2(DNAH11):​c.4491G>A​(p.Glu1497=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000482 in 1,584,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH11
NM_001277115.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.118
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH11 (HGNC:2942): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 11) This gene encodes a ciliary outer dynein arm protein and is a member of the dynein heavy chain family. It is a microtubule-dependent motor ATPase and has been reported to be involved in the movement of respiratory cilia. Mutations in this gene have been implicated in causing Kartagener Syndrome (a combination of situs inversus totalis and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD), also called Immotile Cilia Syndrome 1 (ICS1)) and male sterility. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 7-21620069-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-21620069-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 257897.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr7-21620069-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.118 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000237 (36/152192) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0075 (36/4800). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00557. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 28 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 12 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
DNAH11NM_001277115.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.4491G>A p.Glu1497= synonymous_variant 25/82 ENST00000409508.8 NP_001264044.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAH11ENST00000409508.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.4491G>A p.Glu1497= synonymous_variant 25/825 NM_001277115.2 ENSP00000475939 P1
DNAH11ENST00000465593.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.517G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 3/42

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152074
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00749
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00104
AC:
234
AN:
224728
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00132
AC XY:
161
AN XY:
121990
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00905
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000565
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000734
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000508
AC:
728
AN:
1432794
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000721
AC XY:
513
AN XY:
711326
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000256
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00826
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000309
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000674
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152192
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000376
AC XY:
28
AN XY:
74398
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00750
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000126
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000604
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00462
AC:
16
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 7 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAl Jalila Children’s Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality HospitalNov 23, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 28, 2022This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2023DNAH11: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
5.8
DANN
Benign
0.34

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs564202359; hg19: chr7-21659687; API