rs565065320

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_024757.5(EHMT1):ā€‹c.905A>Gā€‹(p.Lys302Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000163 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00025 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00015 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

EHMT1
NM_024757.5 missense

Scores

5
3
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.93
Variant links:
Genes affected
EHMT1 (HGNC:24650): (euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a histone methyltransferase that methylates the lysine-9 position of histone H3. This action marks the genomic region packaged with these methylated histones for transcriptional repression. This protein may be involved in the silencing of MYC- and E2F-responsive genes and therefore could play a role in the G0/G1 cell cycle transition. Defects in this gene are a cause of chromosome 9q subtelomeric deletion syndrome (9q-syndrome, also known as Kleefstra syndrome). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.08928025).
BP6
Variant 9-137743452-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-137743452-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 210930.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr9-137743452-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00025 (38/152250) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00098 (15/15306). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000604. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 20 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 38 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
EHMT1NM_024757.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.905A>G p.Lys302Arg missense_variant 5/27 ENST00000460843.6 NP_079033.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EHMT1ENST00000460843.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.905A>G p.Lys302Arg missense_variant 5/275 NM_024757.5 ENSP00000417980 Q9H9B1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000250
AC:
38
AN:
152132
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000981
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000207
AC:
52
AN:
251414
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000213
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
135896
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000815
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000154
AC:
225
AN:
1461822
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000155
AC XY:
113
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00108
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000514
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000108
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000348
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000250
AC:
38
AN:
152250
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000269
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000980
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000195
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000264
ExAC
AF:
0.000206
AC:
25
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000654
EpiControl
AF:
0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 15, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2024EHMT1: BS2 -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaNov 06, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 22, 2015- -
Kleefstra syndrome 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationLaboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 15, 2017This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.27
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.16
T;.;T;T;.;T;T;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.75
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.73
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.050
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.089
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.60
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.3
M;M;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.79
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.4
N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;.;.;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.45
MutPred
0.19
Loss of methylation at K302 (P = 0.02);Loss of methylation at K302 (P = 0.02);Loss of methylation at K302 (P = 0.02);.;.;.;.;.;
MVP
0.69
MPC
0.29
ClinPred
0.10
T
GERP RS
5.4
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.52
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs565065320; hg19: chr9-140637904; COSMIC: COSV58371070; COSMIC: COSV58371070; API