rs5744973

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.5678+4C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00257 in 1,613,188 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 104 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 47 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 57 hom. )

Consequence

POLE
NM_006231.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.001402

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0470

Variant links:

Genes affected

POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

POLE links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).

BP6

Variant 12-132638010-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132638010-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 221106.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-132638010-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0129 (1962/152190) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0443 (1841/41514). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0427. There are 47 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 964 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 47 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
POLE	NM_006231.4 link	c.5678+4C>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 41 of 48	ENST00000320574.10	NP_006222.2	Q07864
POLE	XM_011534795.4 link	c.5678+4C>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 41 of 47		XP_011533097.1
POLE	XM_011534797.4 link	c.4757+4C>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 33 of 39		XP_011533099.1
POLE	XM_011534802.4 link	c.2666+4C>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 17 of 23		XP_011533104.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
POLE	ENST00000320574.10 link	c.5678+4C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 41 of 48	1	NM_006231.4	ENSP00000322570.5		Q07864

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0127

AC:

1925

AN:

152072

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0436

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00472

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000368

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0101

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00349

AC:

877

AN:

250976

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00257

AC XY:

348

AN XY:

135592

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0462

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00226

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000980

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000344

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00149

AC:

2181

AN:

1460998

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00132

AC XY:

961

AN XY:

726822

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0466

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00264

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000128

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000174

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00424

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0129

AC:

1962

AN:

152190

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0130

AC XY:

964

AN XY:

74404

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0443

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00471

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000368

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00995

Alfa

AF:

0.00410

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0149

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00462

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000654

EpiControl

AF:

0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:18

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:6

Nov 05, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 19, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The POLE c.5678+4C>T variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide located in an intronic position outside of the canonical slice sites. Mutation taster predicts a benign outcome for this variant along with 4/5 in silico splice site tools predicting the variant not to have an impact on splicing. This variant was found in 550/121298 control chromosomes (16 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African, 16 homozygotes subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0479531 (499/10406). This frequency is about 3376 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic POLE variant (0.0000142), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African. In addition a clinical diagnostic laboratory classified this variant as Benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

Feb 17, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 11, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:5

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 09, 2016

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Oct 10, 2017

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 27, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 06, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12

Benign:2

May 25, 2016

Counsyl

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The POLE c.5678+4C>T variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs5744973) as "With Benign allele" and ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, Counsyl, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, and four other clinical laboratories). The variant was identified in control databases in 1227 of 276680 chromosomes (23 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.004, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 1091 of 24018 chromosomes (freq: 0.045), Other in 17 of 6462 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Latino in 77 of 34402 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), European in 40 of 126262 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), and South Asian in 2 of 30770 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The c.5678+4C>T variant is located in the 5' splice region but does not affect the invariant +1 and +2 positions. However, positions +3 to +6 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12;C3554576:Facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome;C5193036:Intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2022

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.81

CADD

Benign

2.1

DANN

Benign

0.71

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.0014

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.050

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over