Menu
GeneBe

rs57946868

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000165.5(GJA1):c.717G>A(p.Arg239=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0166 in 1,613,866 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 431 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R239R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.031 ( 145 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.015 ( 286 hom. )

Consequence

GJA1
NM_000165.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.03
Variant links:
Genes affected
GJA1 (HGNC:4274): (gap junction protein alpha 1) This gene is a member of the connexin gene family. The encoded protein is a component of gap junctions, which are composed of arrays of intercellular channels that provide a route for the diffusion of low molecular weight materials from cell to cell. The encoded protein is the major protein of gap junctions in the heart that are thought to have a crucial role in the synchronized contraction of the heart and in embryonic development. A related intronless pseudogene has been mapped to chromosome 5. Mutations in this gene have been associated with oculodentodigital dysplasia, autosomal recessive craniometaphyseal dysplasia and heart malformations. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 6-121447564-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-121447564-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137482.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-121447564-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr6-121447564-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.03 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0759 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GJA1NM_000165.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.717G>A p.Arg239= synonymous_variant 2/2 ENST00000282561.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GJA1ENST00000282561.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.717G>A p.Arg239= synonymous_variant 2/21 NM_000165.5 P1
GJA1ENST00000647564.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.717G>A p.Arg239= synonymous_variant 2/2 P1
GJA1ENST00000649003.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.717G>A p.Arg239= synonymous_variant 2/2 P1
GJA1ENST00000650427.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.717G>A p.Arg239= synonymous_variant 2/2 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0308
AC:
4681
AN:
151952
Hom.:
145
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0783
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0157
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00232
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0362
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00283
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0130
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0240
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0174
AC:
4387
AN:
251464
Hom.:
81
AF XY:
0.0172
AC XY:
2339
AN XY:
135912
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0831
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00919
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00923
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0324
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00397
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0126
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0137
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0151
AC:
22097
AN:
1461796
Hom.:
286
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0155
AC XY:
11294
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0824
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0100
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0337
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00468
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0185
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0308
AC:
4684
AN:
152070
Hom.:
145
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0308
AC XY:
2293
AN XY:
74340
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0781
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0157
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00233
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0362
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00283
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0130
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0237
Alfa
AF:
0.00918
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.0328
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0220
AC:
77
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0139
EpiControl
AF:
0.0123

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 11, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMay 07, 2014- -
Oculodentodigital dysplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Syndactyly type 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Oculodentodigital dysplasia, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Hypoplastic left heart syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
Cadd
Benign
0.32
Dann
Benign
0.29

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs57946868; hg19: chr6-121768710; API