rs58386780

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_020297.4(ABCC9):c.789C>T(p.Cys263Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00251 in 1,611,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 56 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 28 hom., cov: 24)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 28 hom. )

Consequence

ABCC9
NM_020297.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.467

Variant links:

Genes affected

ABCC9 (HGNC:60): (ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 9) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MRP subfamily which is involved in multi-drug resistance. This protein is thought to form ATP-sensitive potassium channels in cardiac, skeletal, and vascular and non-vascular smooth muscle. Protein structure suggests a role as the drug-binding channel-modulating subunit of the extra-pancreatic ATP-sensitive potassium channels. Mutations in this gene are associated with cardiomyopathy dilated type 1O. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2011]

ABCC9 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).

BP6

Variant 12-21915695-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-21915695-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 35635.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-21915695-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.467 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0108 (1624/149736) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0358 (1454/40660). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0342. There are 28 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 782 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 24. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 28 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ABCC9	NM_020297.4 link	c.789C>T	p.Cys263Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 40	ENST00000261200.9	NP_064693.2	O60706-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ABCC9	ENST00000261200.9 link	c.789C>T	p.Cys263Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 40	5	NM_020297.4	ENSP00000261200.4		O60706-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0108

AC:

1619

AN:

149628

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0357

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00328

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0254

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000211

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00955

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000237

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00682

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00402

AC:

1009

AN:

250920

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00319

AC XY:

432

AN XY:

135618

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0379

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00211

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0252

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000406

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00310

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00166

AC:

2426

AN:

1461398

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00155

AC XY:

1124

AN XY:

727016

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0350

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00237

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0262

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000180

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00406

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0108

AC:

1624

AN:

149736

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0107

AC XY:

782

AN XY:

72994

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0358

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00328

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0254

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000237

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00674

Alfa

AF:

0.00480

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0125

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00491

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000600

EpiControl

AF:

0.000652

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Jan 24, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 08, 2009

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1O

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Sep 21, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypertrichotic osteochondrodysplasia Cantu type

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Aug 18, 2011

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

ABCC9-related disorder

Benign:1

May 03, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.43

CADD

Benign

8.8

DANN

Benign

0.64

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.10

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over