rs587780181

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM4BP6

The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):​c.246_260delCCAAGAACCTGAGGA​(p.Asp82_Glu86del) variant causes a disruptive inframe deletion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000129 in 1,613,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_007194.4 disruptive_inframe_deletion

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:20B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.336
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.

PM4
Nonframeshift variant in NON repetitive region in NM_007194.4.
BP6
Variant 22-28734461-CTCCTCAGGTTCTTGG-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-28734461-CTCCTCAGGTTCTTGG-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 128069.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=18}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHEK2NM_007194.4 linkc.246_260delCCAAGAACCTGAGGA p.Asp82_Glu86del disruptive_inframe_deletion Exon 2 of 15 ENST00000404276.6 NP_009125.1 O96017-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHEK2ENST00000404276.6 linkc.246_260delCCAAGAACCTGAGGA p.Asp82_Glu86del disruptive_inframe_deletion Exon 2 of 15 1 NM_007194.4 ENSP00000385747.1 O96017-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
152066
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000197
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000147
AC:
37
AN:
251436
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000140
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
135898
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000867
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000198
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000272
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000131
AC:
192
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000117
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000650
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000243
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000225
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000110
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
152066
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000808
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74276
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000197
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.000174
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000110

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:20Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:5Benign:1
Dec 10, 2022
Laboratorio de Genetica e Diagnostico Molecular, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

ACMG classification criteria: PS3 supporting, PM4 -

Apr 04, 2023
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

_x000D_ Criteria applied: PS3_MOD, PM4, PS4_SUP -

Jul 04, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant, c.246_260del, results in the deletion of 5 amino acid(s) of the CHEK2 protein (p.Asp82_Glu86del), but otherwise preserves the integrity of the reading frame. This variant is present in population databases (rs587780181, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer, prostate cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, as well as in an individual who underwent genetic testing for Lynch syndrome (PMID: 11949635, 12533788, 17721994, 25980754, 28199314). This variant is also known as 245del15, del223-237, delP75-E79 and D77–E82del. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 128069). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of variants on protein structure and function are not available or were not evaluated for this variant. Experimental studies have shown that this variant affects CHEK2 function (PMID: 17721994, 28199314). Another study showed significant reduction of kinase activity, however, when normalized to protein expression level, kinase activity was similar to wild-type (Scarpa 2017) In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant, c.246_260del, results in the deletion of 5 amino acid(s) of the CHEK2 protein (p.Asp82_Glu86del), but otherwise preserves the integrity of the reading frame. This variant is present in population databases (rs587780181, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer, prostate cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, as well as in an individual who underwent genetic testing for Lynch syndrome (PMID: 11949635, 12533788, 17721994, 25980754, 28199314, 37316882, 38003901). This variant is also known as 245del15, del223-237, delP75-E79 and D77–E82del. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of variants on gene product structure and function are not available or were not evaluated for this variant. Experimental studies have shown that this variant affects CHEK2 function (PMID: 17721994, 28199314). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Jul 26, 2016
Counsyl
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3Benign:2
Sep 22, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Aug 01, 2018
GeneKor MSA
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 16, 2023
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Uncertain:4
Sep 02, 2024
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The CHEK2 c.246_260del (p.Asp82_Glu86del) variant (also known as 245del15, del223-237, delP75-E79, D77-E82del) has been reported in the published literature in individuals with breast/ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 38003901 (2023), 37316882 (2023), 34326862 (2021), 29522266 (2018)), paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma (PMID: 34630562 (2021)), prostate cancer (PMIDs: 32190957 (2020), 12533788 (2003)), Lynch syndrome-associated cancer/polyps (PMID: 25980754 (2015)), and unspecified hereditary cancer (32906215 (2020)). This variant has also been observed in reportedly healthy individuals (PMIDs: 36243179 (2022), 30287823 (2018)). Additionally, this variant co-occurred with a pathogenic variant in the CHEK2 gene in an individual affected with breast cancer in our internal patient population, suggesting this variant may not the primary cause of disease. Functional studies indicate this variant has partial to neutral effects on CHEK2 kinase activity (PMIDs: 28199314 (2017), 17721994 (2007)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00029 (9/30612 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Oct 11, 2022
Revvity Omics, Revvity
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

In-frame deletion of 5 amino acids in a non-repeat region; Observed in individuals with personal and/or family history of CHEK2-related and other cancers (PMID: 12533788, 17721994, 25980754, 28199314, 29522266, 31054147, 34630562, 34326862, 35402282, 37316882, 38350919); Published functional studies are inconclusive: reduced, but not absent, protein expression and kinase activity (PMID: 17721994, 28199314); In silico analysis indicates that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Also known as 245del15, delP75-E79, and D77_E82del; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17721994, 25980754, 12533788, 11949635, 28199314, 29522266, 31054147, 31159747, 32190957, 31843900, 32906215, 35402282, 36479692, 30287823, 34630562, 36243179, 34326862, 37316882, 38350919) -

Dec 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

CHEK2: PM4, PS3:Supporting -

not specified Uncertain:3Benign:1
Jun 22, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

DNA sequence analysis of the CHEK2 gene demonstrated a 15 base pair deletion in exon 2, c.246_260del. This in-frame deletion is predicted to result in the deletion of a 5 amino acid residues, p.Asp82_Glu86del. This in-frame deletion has been described in gnomAD with a frequency of approximately 0.03% in the South Asian sub-population (dbSNP rs587780181). This deletion is not located in a known functional domain. This sequence change was observed in two individuals with prostate cancer, in one individual with a history of Lynch syndrome-associated cancer, and in one individual with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PMID: 28199314, 12533788, 17721994, 11949635, 25980754). Functional studies showed retention of 40-50% of wild-type kinase activity, suggesting partial loss-of-function (PMID:17721994). Another study showed significant reduction of kinase activity, however, when normalized to protein expression level, kinase activity was similar to wild-type (PMID:28199314). Due to the lack of sufficient evidences, the clinical and functional significance of this sequence change is not known at present. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2019
King Laboratory, University of Washington
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

- -

Nov 10, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: CHEK2 c.246_260del15 (p.Asp82_Glu86del) results in an in-frame deletion that is predicted to remove 5 amino acids from the encoded protein. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00013 in 299744 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 causing Breast Cancer (0.00013 vs 0.00031), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.246_260del15 has been reported in the literature in two sporadic prostate cancer patients, one Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patient, one patient being tested for Lynch syndrome, a patient with primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and in settings of multigene panel testing for breast/ovarian cancer, however without a strong evidence for causality (example, Dong_2003, Bell_2007, Hangaishi_2002, Yurgelun_2015, Scarpa_2017, Tsaousis_2019, Vargas-Parra_2020). The patient with Non-Hodkin's lymphoma also carried a cytogenetic abnormality, t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation, with rearrangement between the cyclin D1 gene and the JH region of immunoglobulin heavy chain causing overexpression of cyclin D (Hangaishi_2002). Therefore, these reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer and/or CHEK2-associated phenotypes. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. The most pronounced variant effect results in attenuated phosphorylation activity (40-50% of WT level) (Bell_2007), while an independent functional study showed the variant to reduce expression, but retain normal kinase activity once protein expression has been accounted for (Scarpa_2017). Multiple submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified as VUS (n=15) and likely benign (n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

CHEK2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Mar 08, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The CHEK2 c.246_260del15 variant is predicted to result in an in-frame deletion (p.Asp82_Glu86del). This variant (reported as 245del15) was identified in an individual with sporadic prostate cancer (Table 1, Dong et al. 2003. PubMed ID: 12533788). This variant (reported as delP75-E79) was also identified in individuals with early onset breast and prostate cancer, but in vitro analysis revealed this variant exhibited only partial loss of protein function with 40-50% of normal activity (Bell et al 2007. PubMed ID: 17721994). Functional studies suggest that this variant (referred to as D77-E82del) showed low kinase activity as a result of reduced protein expression (Scarpa et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28199314). It was also identified in a patient with suspected Lynch syndrome and was classified as a variant of uncertain significance (Table S2, Yurgelun et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 25980754). This variant is reported in 0.029% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD and is interpreted as uncertain significance by the vast majority of clinical laboratories in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/128069/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Aug 27, 2021
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Predisposition to cancer Uncertain:1
Jun 24, 2021
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The CHEK2 c.246_260del (p.Asp82_Glu86del) change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.029% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/22-29130449-CTCCTCAGGTTCTTGG-C?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). The change results in the deletion of five amino acid residues in the CHEK2 protein (PM4). In a functional assay of CHEK2 kinase activity, the mutant protein exhibited 40-50% activity as compared to the wild-type (PS3_Supporting; PMID: 17721994). This variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and suspected Lynch syndrome (PMID: 31054147, 25980754, 29522266). It is present 1x in a database of women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (https://whi.color.com/). This alteration is also designated 245del15 and delP75_E79 in published literature. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: PS3_Supporting, PM4. -

Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The CHEK2 p.Asp82_Glu86del variant was identified in 4 of 3682 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with Lynch syndrome-associated cancer and/or polyps, early onset prostate cancer, sporadic prostate cancer, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and was not identified in 846 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Yurgelun 2015, Scarpa 2017, Bell 2007, Dong 2003). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs587780181) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (7x as uncertain significance by GeneDx, Ambry, Invitae, Counsyl, Quest and Integrated Genetics). The variant was identified in control databases in 40 of 277142 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00014 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: South Asian in 9 of 30780 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), European (Finnish) in 7 of 25788 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), East Asian in 4 of 18862 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Ashkenazi Jewish* in 2 of 10152 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Other in 1 of 6460 chromosomes (freq: 0.00015), Latino in 4 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), European (Non-Finnish) in 12 of 126666 chromosomes (freq: 0.000095), and African in 1 of 24014 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004). This variant is an in-frame deletion resulting in the removal of 5 amino acid residues beginning at the aspartic acid (asp) residue at codon 82 to (glu) residue at codon 86; the impact of this alteration on CHEK2 protein function is not known. In vitro analysis of CHEK2 c.246_260del15 showed retention of 40-50% of wild-type kinase activity, suggesting partial loss-of-function (Bell 2007). Another study showed significant reduction of kinase activity, however, when normalized to protein expression level, kinase activity was similar to wild-type (Scarpa 2017). In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Bone osteosarcoma;C2931456:Familial prostate cancer;C5882668:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Jun 08, 2024
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Feb 26, 2025
Mendelics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following: it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease, and/or has normal protein function, and/or has lack of segregation with disease, and/or has been detected in co-occurrence with known pathogenic variant, and/or has lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or is located in a region inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587780181; hg19: chr22-29130449; API