rs587781311

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP2_StrongBS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.2336G>A (NM_004360.5) variant in CDH1 is a missense variant predicted to cause substitution of arginine by glutamine at amino acid 779 (p.Arg779Gln). This variant was observed in the homozygous state in an individual without a personal and/or family history of diffuse gastric cancer, lobular breast cancer (BP2_Strong; internal clinical data). This variant has been observed in more than 10 (134) individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC. (BS2; PMID:29522266, 36436516; ClinVar SCVs: SCV000172951.7, SCV000288462.10, SCV000210875.16; internal lab contributors). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as benign for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen CDH1 variant curation expert panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2, BP2_S. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA293940/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000027 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

4
8
7

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:8B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.01
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.2336G>A p.Arg779Gln missense_variant 15/16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2153G>A p.Arg718Gln missense_variant 14/15 NP_001304113.1 P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.788G>A p.Arg263Gln missense_variant 15/16 NP_001304114.1 P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.371G>A p.Arg124Gln missense_variant 14/15 NP_001304115.1 P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.2336G>A p.Arg779Gln missense_variant 15/161 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152064
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000159
AC:
4
AN:
251462
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000736
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135906
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000267
AC:
39
AN:
1461876
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000344
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000315
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152064
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000808
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74278
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.0000564
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000567
ExAC
AF:
0.0000247
AC:
3
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:3
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:3Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 06, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 12, 2016- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelMar 25, 2024The c.2336G>A (NM_004360.5) variant in CDH1 is a missense variant predicted to cause substitution of arginine by glutamine at amino acid 779 (p.Arg779Gln). This variant was observed in the homozygous state in an individual without a personal and/or family history of diffuse gastric cancer, lobular breast cancer (BP2_Strong; internal clinical data). This variant has been observed in more than 10 (134) individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC. (BS2; PMID: 29522266, 36436516; ClinVar SCVs: SCV000172951.7, SCV000288462.10, SCV000210875.16; internal lab contributors). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as benign for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen CDH1 variant curation expert panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2, BP2_S. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 20, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEuropean Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de InvestigaĆ§Ć£o e InovaĆ§Ć£o em SaĆŗde, University of PortoAug 01, 2022BS2_Supporting (PMID: 30311375) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 17, 2023This missense variant replaces arginine with glutamine at codon 779 of the CDH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 29522266, Lovejoy et al. 2018). In a large breast cancer case-control study conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 6/60466 cases and 1/53461 unaffected controls, showing inconclusive association with disease (OR=5.305 (95%CI 0.639 to 44.07); p-value=0.13; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID CDH1_000359) (PMID: 33471991). This variant has been identified in 5/282808 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 20, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 03, 2023Variant summary: CDH1 c.2336G>A (p.Arg779Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the cadherin, cytoplasmic domain (IPR000233) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 251462 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.2336G>A has been reported in the literature in one individual affected with breast cancer (Hauke_2018). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with breast cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified it as either VUS (n=4) or likely benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
CDH1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 23, 2024The CDH1 c.2336G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg779Gln. This variant has been reported in multiple individuals with a personal or familial history of breast cancer (Table S2, Hauke et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 29522266; Table S5, Garcia-Pelaez et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 36436516). This variant has interpretations ranging from benign to uncertain in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/140840/). This variant is reported in 0.0040% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD. Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 05, 2023Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with personal and/or family history of breast cancer (Hauke et al., 2018; Garcia-Pelaez et al., 2023); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27499925, 28522829, 26643872, 22850631, 15235021, 36436516, 29522266) -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsOct 30, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.29
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.063
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.080
CADD
Pathogenic
31
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.34
T;T;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.83
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.84
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.030
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.46
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.50
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.8
M;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.65
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
N;.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.37
Sift
Benign
0.030
D;.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.21
T;T;T
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;.
Vest4
0.61
MutPred
0.60
Loss of stability (P = 0.1532);.;.;
MVP
0.88
MPC
0.98
ClinPred
0.96
D
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.33
gMVP
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587781311; hg19: chr16-68863597; COSMIC: COSV99932332; API