rs587781976

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):ā€‹c.1409A>Gā€‹(p.Asn470Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000088 in 1,613,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N470Y) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000090 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.73
Variant links:
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.083332896).
BP6
Variant 2-214767641-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-214767641-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 141739.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Uncertain_significance=5, Benign=1}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 11 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BARD1NM_000465.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1409A>G p.Asn470Ser missense_variant 6/11 ENST00000260947.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BARD1ENST00000260947.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1409A>G p.Asn470Ser missense_variant 6/111 NM_000465.4 P2Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
11
AN:
152146
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000104
AC:
26
AN:
251202
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000958
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
135746
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000792
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000896
AC:
131
AN:
1461712
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000894
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
727164
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000768
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000666
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000828
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
11
AN:
152146
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000942
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74334
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000129
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000117
ExAC
AF:
0.0000906
AC:
11
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 16, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 470 of the BARD1 protein (p.Asn470Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs587781976, gnomAD 0.05%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, and/or suspected Lynch syndrome (PMID: 14550946, 20077502, 25980754, 26315354). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 141739). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The serine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect BARD1 function (PMID: 18480049). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Feb 24, 2023This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMay 09, 2018The BARD1 variant designated as NM_000465.3:c.1409A>G (p.Asn470Ser) is classified as likely benign. This variant is listed in ClinVar (Variation ID: 141739) and has been classified as likely benign by another laboratory. The missense change resulting from this variant does not lead to structural defects in the protein (Fox et al, 2008, PMID: 18480049). Additionally, in one observed family, there are no BARD1-associated cancers reported for several individuals over age 50 who have or are at risk of having the variant. Bayesian analysis integrating all of this data (Tavtigian et al, 2018, PMID:29300386) gives about a 1% probability of pathogenicity, which is consistent with a classification of likely benign. This variant is not predicted to alter BARD1 function or modify cancer risk. A modest (less than 2 fold) increase in cancer risk due to this variant cannot be excluded. This analysis was performed in conjunction with the family studies project as part of the University of Washington Find My Variant Study. -
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 31, 2024In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with BARD1-related and other cancers, but also in healthy controls (PMID: 33471991, 35534704, 20077502, 14550946, 26315354, 27443514, 35734982, 36187937); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26738429, 15342711, 14550946, 20077502, 15855896, 19584272, 16633366, 23056176, 25980754, 27443514, 26315354, 27338793, 30374176, 34426522, 26787654, 31371347, 35734982, 36187937, 35949786, 18480049, 37418175, 33471991, 35534704) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoNov 12, 2021In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMIDs: 14550946 (2003), 26787654 (2016), 35734982 (2022), 33471991 (2021); see also LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/)), endometrial/ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 27443514 (2016), 26315354 (2015)), and suspected Lynch syndrome (PMID: 25980754 (2015)). In addition, this variant has been observed in healthy control individuals (PMIDs: 20077502 (2010), 33471991 (2021)), and in an individual with colon cancer who co-carried a pathogenic variant in the APC gene (PMID: 30374176 (2019)). This variant has been reported to have no observable defects to the crystal structure of the BARD1 ankyrin repeat domain, however the effect of this variant on protein function and activity were not assessed (PMID: 18480049 (2008)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00048 (12/25110 chromosomes in European (Finnish) subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2022BARD1: BP4, BP5, BS1 -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 14, 2022Variant summary: BARD1 c.1409A>G (p.Asn470Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Ankyrin repeat-containing domain (IPR020683) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. Additionally, Fox_2008 reports that this variant does not results in observable structural defects. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00011 in 290022 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00048 within the Finnish subpopulation in the gnomAD database and publications. The observed variant frequency within Finnish control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BARD1 causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.00025), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Finnish origin. c.1409A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer, ovarian cancer or endometrial cancer as well as one individual who had a history of Lynch syndrome associated cancer and/or polyps, but has also been found in healthy controls (example, Ishitobi_2003, DeBrakeleer_2010, Yurgelun_2015, Ramus_2015, Young_2016, Ring_2016, Tsai_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant have been reported (APC c.220+2T>A, Tsai_2019), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments benign/likely benign, n=5; VUS, n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 08, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 09, 2015- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationGerman Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital CologneJan 17, 2024Additional evidence agains pathogenicity from family/clinical data (see entries by Myriad and University of Washington). According to the ACMG standard criteria we chose these criteria: BP4 (supporting benign): CADD:15.07 REVEL: 0.17 BayesDEL:-0.584707, BS1 (supporting benign): gnomAD AF in FE -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.050
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.76
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.99
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.81
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.84
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.86
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.013
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.083
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.53
N;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.75
D;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.37
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.3
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.24
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T;T
Polyphen
0.34
B;.
Vest4
0.15
MVP
0.68
MPC
0.11
ClinPred
0.045
T
GERP RS
0.28
Varity_R
0.21
gMVP
0.28

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587781976; hg19: chr2-215632365; API