rs587782682
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_004329.3(BMPR1A):c.682C>A(p.Arg228Arg) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000135 in 1,613,734 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004329.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coliInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
- juvenile polyposis syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- polyposis syndrome, hereditary mixed, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary mixed polyposis syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- congenital heart defects, multiple typesInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- pulmonary arterial hypertensionInheritance: Unknown Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152034Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000318 AC: 8AN: 251336 AF XY: 0.0000368 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000148 AC: 216AN: 1461700Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000150 AC XY: 109AN XY: 727162 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152034Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74256 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
Juvenile polyposis syndrome Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
not provided Benign:2
- -
Variant summary: The BMPR1A c.682C>A (p.Arg228Arg) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect ESE sites. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 5/119922 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.000076 (5/65736). This frequency is about 38 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BMPR1A variant (0.000002), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Non-Finnish) origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as likely benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
not specified Benign:1
- -
BMPR1A-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Juvenile polyposis syndrome;C1864730:Polyposis syndrome, hereditary mixed, 2 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at