rs587782760

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_004329.3(BMPR1A):c.676-3A>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000799 in 1,613,784 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000087 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BMPR1A
NM_004329.3 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.00007790

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.801

Variant links:

Genes affected

BMPR1A (HGNC:1076): (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1A) The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors are a family of transmembrane serine/threonine kinases that include the type I receptors BMPR1A and BMPR1B and the type II receptor BMPR2. These receptors are also closely related to the activin receptors, ACVR1 and ACVR2. The ligands of these receptors are members of the TGF-beta superfamily. TGF-betas and activins transduce their signals through the formation of heteromeric complexes with 2 different types of serine (threonine) kinase receptors: type I receptors of about 50-55 kD and type II receptors of about 70-80 kD. Type II receptors bind ligands in the absence of type I receptors, but they require their respective type I receptors for signaling, whereas type I receptors require their respective type II receptors for ligand binding. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

BMPR1A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).

BP6

Variant 10-86917131-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86917131-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 142843.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=2}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000869 (127/1461662) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000112 (124/1111868). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000956. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 64 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
BMPR1A	NM_004329.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.676-3A>C		splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant		ENST00000372037.8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
BMPR1A	ENST00000372037.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.676-3A>C		splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant		1	NM_004329.3	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000398

AC:

AN:

251256

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000736

AC XY:

AN XY:

135806

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000869

AC:

127

AN:

1461662

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000880

AC XY:

AN XY:

727142

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000497

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74318

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000151

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Juvenile polyposis syndrome

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 21, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health	Nov 02, 2023	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Myriad Genetics, Inc.	Mar 02, 2023	This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Oct 09, 2019	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Dec 11, 2020	- -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Oct 09, 2019

Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Nucleotide substitution has no predicted effect on splicing and is not conserved across species; Observed in individuals with breast cancer (Desmond 2015, Tung 2016); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26976419, 26270727) -

Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Counsyl

Jan 13, 2016

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.60

Cadd

Benign

7.0

Dann

Benign

0.63

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.000078

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.052

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over