rs5930

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000527.5(LDLR):​c.1413A>G​(p.Arg471Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.621 in 1,613,574 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 313,036 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.66 ( 33019 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.62 ( 280017 hom. )

Consequence

LDLR
NM_000527.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.476

Publications

103 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LDLR (HGNC:6547): (low density lipoprotein receptor) The low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene family consists of cell surface proteins involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis of specific ligands. The encoded protein is normally bound at the cell membrane, where it binds low density lipoprotein/cholesterol and is taken into the cell. Lysosomes release the cholesterol, which is made available for repression of microsomal enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting step in cholesterol synthesis. At the same time, a reciprocal stimulation of cholesterol ester synthesis takes place. Mutations in this gene cause the autosomal dominant disorder, familial hypercholesterolemia. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
MIR6886 (HGNC:50121): (microRNA 6886) microRNAs (miRNAs) are short (20-24 nt) non-coding RNAs that are involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in multicellular organisms by affecting both the stability and translation of mRNAs. miRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II as part of capped and polyadenylated primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs) that can be either protein-coding or non-coding. The primary transcript is cleaved by the Drosha ribonuclease III enzyme to produce an approximately 70-nt stem-loop precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which is further cleaved by the cytoplasmic Dicer ribonuclease to generate the mature miRNA and antisense miRNA star (miRNA*) products. The mature miRNA is incorporated into a RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which recognizes target mRNAs through imperfect base pairing with the miRNA and most commonly results in translational inhibition or destabilization of the target mRNA. The RefSeq represents the predicted microRNA stem-loop. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 19-11113589-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-11113589-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 200916.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.476 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.74 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LDLRNM_000527.5 linkc.1413A>G p.Arg471Arg synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 18 ENST00000558518.6 NP_000518.1 P01130-1A0A024R7D5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LDLRENST00000558518.6 linkc.1413A>G p.Arg471Arg synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 18 1 NM_000527.5 ENSP00000454071.1 P01130-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.655
AC:
99478
AN:
151868
Hom.:
32972
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.747
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.530
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.694
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.619
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.610
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.619
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.647
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.630
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.602
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.626
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.632
AC:
158684
AN:
251072
AF XY:
0.626
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.747
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.712
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.631
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.609
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.639
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.601
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.612
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.618
AC:
902905
AN:
1461586
Hom.:
280017
Cov.:
54
AF XY:
0.616
AC XY:
448236
AN XY:
727108
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.758
AC:
25373
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.710
AC:
31761
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.629
AC:
16448
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.609
AC:
24157
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.613
AC:
52865
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.630
AC:
33621
AN:
53350
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.610
AC:
3520
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.610
AC:
677824
AN:
1111806
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.618
AC:
37336
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20363
40726
61089
81452
101815
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18480
36960
55440
73920
92400
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.655
AC:
99574
AN:
151988
Hom.:
33019
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.656
AC XY:
48751
AN XY:
74266
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.747
AC:
31009
AN:
41488
American (AMR)
AF:
0.694
AC:
10593
AN:
15258
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.619
AC:
2147
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.610
AC:
3137
AN:
5140
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.619
AC:
2978
AN:
4808
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.647
AC:
6828
AN:
10558
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.629
AC:
185
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.602
AC:
40900
AN:
67954
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.624
AC:
1315
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1727
3455
5182
6910
8637
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
794
1588
2382
3176
3970
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.615
Hom.:
93317
Bravo
AF:
0.663
Asia WGS
AF:
0.582
AC:
2027
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.604
EpiControl
AF:
0.608

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Benign:7
May 30, 2017
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratorium voor Moleculaire Diagnostiek Experimentele Vasculaire Geneeskunde, Academisch Medisch Centrum
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

- -

Mar 25, 2016
LDLR-LOVD, British Heart Foundation
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:literature only

- -

May 23, 2018
Department of Human Genetics, Laborarztpraxis Dres. Walther, Weindel und Kollegen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Due to the increased occurrence of the mutation (>= 5%), this variant is classified as benign. -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Mar 01, 2016
Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

20 Hmz + 37 Htz / 92 non-FH individuals; MAF = 29,7% in 86 Spanish healthy individuals -

Jun 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:5
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BA1 -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 09, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Arg471Arg in exon 10 of LDLR: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 38.4% (3301/8600) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequen cing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs5930). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial hypercholesterolemia Benign:4
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 09, 2023
Cohesion Phenomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 18, 2022
GENinCode PLC
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 30, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 23, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
3.7
DANN
Benign
0.54
PhyloP100
-0.48
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5930; hg19: chr19-11224265; COSMIC: COSV52942241; COSMIC: COSV52942241; API