rs61733199
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000261195.3(GYS2):āc.1636A>Gā(p.Thr546Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0173 in 1,605,770 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 312 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T546T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000261195.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GYS2 | NM_021957.4 | c.1636A>G | p.Thr546Ala | missense_variant | 13/16 | ENST00000261195.3 | NP_068776.2 | |
GYS2 | XM_024448960.2 | c.1636A>G | p.Thr546Ala | missense_variant | 13/17 | XP_024304728.1 | ||
GYS2 | XM_006719063.4 | c.1405A>G | p.Thr469Ala | missense_variant | 12/15 | XP_006719126.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GYS2 | ENST00000261195.3 | c.1636A>G | p.Thr546Ala | missense_variant | 13/16 | 1 | NM_021957.4 | ENSP00000261195 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0144 AC: 2199AN: 152228Hom.: 22 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0160 AC: 4020AN: 251344Hom.: 59 AF XY: 0.0161 AC XY: 2182AN XY: 135842
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0176 AC: 25533AN: 1453424Hom.: 290 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0170 AC XY: 12335AN XY: 723628
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0144 AC: 2199AN: 152346Hom.: 22 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0157 AC XY: 1173AN XY: 74506
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Glycogen storage disorder due to hepatic glycogen synthase deficiency Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 08, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Jun 07, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at