rs61733587
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_004006.3(DMD):c.1554T>A(p.Asp518Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0019 in 1,205,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. There are 652 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 18 hom., 329 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 11 hom. 323 hem. )
Consequence
DMD
NM_004006.3 missense
NM_004006.3 missense
Scores
1
5
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.56
Genes affected
DMD (HGNC:2928): (dystrophin) This gene spans a genomic range of greater than 2 Mb and encodes a large protein containing an N-terminal actin-binding domain and multiple spectrin repeats. The encoded protein forms a component of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC), which bridges the inner cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. Deletions, duplications, and point mutations at this gene locus may cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), or cardiomyopathy. Alternative promoter usage and alternative splicing result in numerous distinct transcript variants and protein isoforms for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007825434).
BP6
?
Variant X-32595805-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-32595805-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 94473.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-32595805-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chrX-32595805-A-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0104 (1168/112299) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0362 (1121/30948). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0345. There are 18 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 329 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 18 XL gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMD | NM_004006.3 | c.1554T>A | p.Asp518Glu | missense_variant | 13/79 | ENST00000357033.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMD | ENST00000357033.9 | c.1554T>A | p.Asp518Glu | missense_variant | 13/79 | 1 | NM_004006.3 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0104 AC: 1167AN: 112243Hom.: 18 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00950 AC XY: 327AN XY: 34403
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
1167
AN:
112243
Hom.:
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
AC XY:
327
AN XY:
34403
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00287 AC: 526AN: 183134Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00219 AC XY: 148AN XY: 67612
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
526
AN:
183134
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
148
AN XY:
67612
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00103 AC: 1126AN: 1092809Hom.: 11 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.000902 AC XY: 323AN XY: 358283
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1126
AN:
1092809
Hom.:
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
AC XY:
323
AN XY:
358283
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0104 AC: 1168AN: 112299Hom.: 18 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00954 AC XY: 329AN XY: 34469
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
1168
AN:
112299
Hom.:
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
AC XY:
329
AN XY:
34469
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
134
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
402
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 04, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 17, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 23, 2021 | Variant summary: DMD c.1554T>A (p.Asp518Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0029 in 183134 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 260 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DMD causing Dystrophinopathies phenotype (1.1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1554T>A in individuals affected with Dystrophinopathies and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Apr 11, 2019 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 18, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 21, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jan 11, 2016 | - - |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy;na:Dystrophin deficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 20, 2017 | - - |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy;C3668940:Dilated cardiomyopathy 3B Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jan 21, 2022 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 3B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 15, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;T
Polyphen
1.0, 1.0
.;D;.;.;D
Vest4
MutPred
0.37
.;.;Gain of catalytic residue at D518 (P = 0.0711);Gain of catalytic residue at D518 (P = 0.0711);.;
MVP
MPC
0.099
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at