rs61737684

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):c.1866G>T(p.Leu622Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000736 in 1,586,290 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0041 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

CEP152
NM_001194998.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.442

Variant links:

Genes affected

CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

CEP152 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).

BP6

Variant 15-48768998-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48768998-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 158234.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.442 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00413 (628/152242) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0146 (607/41550). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0136. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 284 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP152	NM_001194998.2 link	c.1866G>T	p.Leu622Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 27	ENST00000380950.7	NP_001181927.1	O94986-4Q3B7A2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP152	ENST00000380950.7 link	c.1866G>T	p.Leu622Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 27	1	NM_001194998.2	ENSP00000370337.2	O94986-4
CEP152	ENST00000399334.7 link	c.1866G>T	p.Leu622Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 26	1		ENSP00000382271.3	O94986-3
CEP152	ENST00000325747.9 link	c.1587G>T	p.Leu529Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 25	1		ENSP00000321000.5	O94986-1
CEP152	ENST00000559398.1 link	n.566G>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 3 of 3	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00413

AC:

628

AN:

152124

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0147

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00192

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00109

AC:

269

AN:

246114

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000816

AC XY:

109

AN XY:

133514

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0163

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000499

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000897

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000334

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000376

AC:

539

AN:

1434048

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000346

AC XY:

247

AN XY:

714458

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0141

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000496

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000119

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000367

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000791

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00413

AC:

628

AN:

152242

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00382

AC XY:

284

AN XY:

74424

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0146

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00190

Alfa

AF:

0.00109

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00458

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Mar 04, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Nov 26, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 07, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Seckel syndrome 5

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.63

CADD

Benign

1.3

DANN

Benign

0.59

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over