rs61742472

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_002471.4(MYH6):​c.1131C>T​(p.Asp377Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000183 in 1,613,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00059 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MYH6
NM_002471.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.983

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH6 (HGNC:7576): (myosin heavy chain 6) Cardiac muscle myosin is a hexamer consisting of two heavy chain subunits, two light chain subunits, and two regulatory subunits. This gene encodes the alpha heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. The gene is located approximately 4kb downstream of the gene encoding the beta heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. Mutations in this gene cause familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial septal defect 3. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2017]
MYH6 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 14
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • Keppen-Lubinsky syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Illumina
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • atrial septal defect 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 14-23402474-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-23402474-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 227584.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.983 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000592 (90/151910) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00191 (79/41402). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00157. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 40 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 90 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH6NM_002471.4 linkc.1131C>T p.Asp377Asp synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 39 ENST00000405093.9 NP_002462.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH6ENST00000405093.9 linkc.1131C>T p.Asp377Asp synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 39 5 NM_002471.4 ENSP00000386041.3
MYH6ENST00000557461.2 linkn.1198C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 12 of 14 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000580
AC:
88
AN:
151792
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000328
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000589
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000195
AC:
49
AN:
251164
AF XY:
0.000147
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000173
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000140
AC:
205
AN:
1461182
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000125
AC XY:
91
AN XY:
726888
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00206
AC:
69
AN:
33458
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000179
AC:
8
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86232
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53234
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000373
AC:
2
AN:
5366
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000101
AC:
112
AN:
1112000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000215
AC:
13
AN:
60338
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.440
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
23
35
46
58
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000592
AC:
90
AN:
151910
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000539
AC XY:
40
AN XY:
74236
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00191
AC:
79
AN:
41402
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000327
AC:
5
AN:
15282
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5126
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10564
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000589
AC:
4
AN:
67936
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000947
AC:
2
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
13
17
21
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000857
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000695
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 06, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Asp377Asp in exon 12 of MYH6: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.2% (18/10384) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broa dinstitute.org; dbSNP rs61742472). -

Mar 25, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: MYH6 c.1131C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00023 in 276770 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0017 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 68 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MYH6 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1131C>T in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (X3 likely benign and X3 uncertain significance). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 16, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:3
-
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 03, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 14 Benign:1
Dec 11, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Oct 12, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jun 29, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.77
CADD
Benign
0.081
DANN
Benign
0.83
PhyloP100
-0.98
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61742472; hg19: chr14-23871683; API