rs61749670
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points: 14P and 0B. PP1PM3PM2_SupportingPP4_ModeratePVS1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_000180.4(GUCY2D):c.389del (p.Pro130LeufsTer?) variant is a frameshift variant in exon 2 of 20, and is predicted to lead to nonsense-mediated decay in a gene in which loss-of-function is an established mechanism of disease (PVS1). This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1.0 at a total allele frequency of 0.000002639, with 4 alleles / 1515578 total alleles, which is lower than the ClinGen LCA/eoRD VCEP PM2_Supporting threshold of <0.0004 (PM2_Supporting). At least one proband harboring this variant exhibits a phenotype including a diagnosis of LCA (0.5 pts), present at birth (1.0 pt), nystagmus (1.0 pt), extinguished ERG (0.5 pt), photophobia (1 pt) and dyschromatopsia (1 pt). That proband also had clinical exome sequencing performed without any additional potential causative variants identified (4 pts). Together these are highly specific for GUCY2D-related recessive retinopathy (total 9 points, PMID:37327959, PP4_Moderate). This variant has been reported in at least 4 unrelated probands with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy who were homozygous for the variant (1 point, PMIDs: 8944027, 10951519). This variant has also been reported in at least 3 probands with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy who were compound heterozygotes with variants not yet classified by the LCA/eoRD VCEP and who were not considered for this code. (1 total point, PM3). The variant has been reported to segregate with childhood-onset severe retinal dystrophy through the proband plus 1 similarly affected relative, with the variant present in the homozygous state (PP1; PMID:8944027). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as Pathogenic for GUCY2D-related recessive retinopathy based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen LCA/eoRD VCEP: PVS1, PP1, PM3, PP4_Moderate, PM2_Supporting. (VCEP specifications version 1.0.0; date of approval 01/22/2025). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA226143/MONDO:0100453/167
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000180.4 frameshift
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151914Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000174 AC: 2AN: 115224Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000157 AC XY: 1AN XY: 63744
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000220 AC: 3AN: 1363664Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000149 AC XY: 1AN XY: 672966
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151914Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74204
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Leber congenital amaurosis 1 Pathogenic:3
- -
- -
- -
not provided Pathogenic:1Other:1
- -
Frameshift variant predicted to result in protein truncation or nonsense mediated decay in a gene for which loss-of-function is a known mechanism of disease; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24265693, 8944027, 20683928, 20604683, 31814694, 32865313, 31736247, 32094338) -
Leber congenital amaurosis Pathogenic:1
- -
Cone-rod dystrophy 6;C2931258:Leber congenital amaurosis 1 Pathogenic:1
This sequence change creates a premature translational stop signal (p.Pro130Leufs*36) in the GUCY2D gene. It is expected to result in an absent or disrupted protein product. Loss-of-function variants in GUCY2D are known to be pathogenic (PMID: 10951519, 11328726). This variant is present in population databases (rs61749670, gnomAD 0.009%). This premature translational stop signal has been observed in individual(s) with autosomal recessive Leber congenital amaurosis (PMID: 8944027, 20683928). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 98602). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
GUCY2D-related recessive retinopathy Pathogenic:1
The NM_000180.4(GUCY2D):c.389del (p.Pro130LeufsTer?) variant is a frameshift variant in exon 2 of 20, and is predicted to lead to nonsense-mediated decay in a gene in which loss-of-function is an established mechanism of disease (PVS1). This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1.0 at a total allele frequency of 0.000002639, with 4 alleles / 1515578 total alleles, which is lower than the ClinGen LCA/eoRD VCEP PM2_Supporting threshold of <0.0004 (PM2_Supporting). At least one proband harboring this variant exhibits a phenotype including a diagnosis of LCA (0.5 pts), present at birth (1.0 pt), nystagmus (1.0 pt), extinguished ERG (0.5 pt), photophobia (1 pt) and dyschromatopsia (1 pt). That proband also had clinical exome sequencing performed without any additional potential causative variants identified (4 pts). Together these are highly specific for GUCY2D-related recessive retinopathy (total 9 points, PMID: 37327959, PP4_Moderate). This variant has been reported in at least 4 unrelated probands with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy who were homozygous for the variant (1 point, PMIDs: 8944027, 10951519). This variant has also been reported in at least 3 probands with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy who were compound heterozygotes with variants not yet classified by the LCA/eoRD VCEP and who were not considered for this code. (1 total point, PM3). The variant has been reported to segregate with childhood-onset severe retinal dystrophy through the proband plus 1 similarly affected relative, with the variant present in the homozygous state (PP1; PMID: 8944027). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as Pathogenic for GUCY2D-related recessive retinopathy based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen LCA/eoRD VCEP: PVS1, PP1, PM3, PP4_Moderate, PM2_Supporting. (VCEP specifications version 1.0.0; date of approval 01/22/2025). -
Cone-rod dystrophy 6;C2931258:Leber congenital amaurosis 1;C4551884:Choroidal dystrophy, central areolar, 1;C5231408:Night blindness, congenital stationary, type1i Pathogenic:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at