rs61756467
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.1737A>G(p.Lys579=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00148 in 1,550,890 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 6 hom. )
Consequence
MSH2
NM_000251.3 synonymous
NM_000251.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.47
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 2-47471040-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47471040-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 36570.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47471040-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr2-47471040-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.47 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00148 (2071/1398534) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0102 (56/5504). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00805. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 1103 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 24. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.1737A>G | p.Lys579= | synonymous_variant | 11/16 | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.1737A>G | p.Lys579= | synonymous_variant | 11/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00149 AC: 227AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
227
AN:
152238
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00215 AC: 540AN: 250870Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00230 AC XY: 312AN XY: 135686
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
540
AN:
250870
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
312
AN XY:
135686
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00148 AC: 2071AN: 1398534Hom.: 6 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.00158 AC XY: 1103AN XY: 699520
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2071
AN:
1398534
Hom.:
Cov.:
24
AF XY:
AC XY:
1103
AN XY:
699520
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00148 AC: 226AN: 152356Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00158 AC XY: 118AN XY: 74514
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
226
AN:
152356
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
118
AN XY:
74514
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:28
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 31, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 12, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 03, 2018 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | MSH2: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Lynch syndrome 1 Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Aug 07, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Jun 28, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | May 07, 2019 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Apr 30, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 02, 2021 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 02, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 20, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Sep 08, 2022 | - - |
Lynch syndrome Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 17, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | research | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Sep 05, 2013 | Synonymous substitution with no effect on splicing, tested with an NMD inhibitor. Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability 0.001-0.049 - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jul 09, 2020 | - - |
MSH2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 10, 2020 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Lys579Lys variant has been identified in 5 out of 3696 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.001) in colorectal patients with Bethesda, Amsterdam or HNPCC criteria, and in 1 out of 400 control chromosomes (frequency 0.003) (Curia 1999, Scartozzi 2002, Auclair 2005, Mangold 2005, Pastrello 2011). it is listed in dbSNP database (‘with unknown allele’) (ID#: rs61756467) with an average heterozygosity of 0.002+/-0.030, therefore increasing the likelihood that this variant is benign. In addition, this variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, and is not located near a splice junction. In summary, based on the above information this variant is classified as Benign. - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at