rs61756468

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000251.3(MSH2):​c.1886A>G​(p.Gln629Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000398 in 1,614,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00055 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

MSH2
NM_000251.3 missense

Scores

3
15

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:18O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.26
Variant links:
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

PM1
In a region_of_interest Interaction with EXO1 (size 70) in uniprot entity MSH2_HUMAN there are 24 pathogenic changes around while only 4 benign (86%) in NM_000251.3
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014180899).
BP6
Variant 2-47475151-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47475151-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 90812.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47475151-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000545 (83/152284) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0145 (75/5180). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0118. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 46 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MSH2NM_000251.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1886A>G p.Gln629Arg missense_variant 12/16 ENST00000233146.7 NP_000242.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MSH2ENST00000233146.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1886A>G p.Gln629Arg missense_variant 12/161 NM_000251.3 ENSP00000233146 P1P43246-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000545
AC:
83
AN:
152166
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0144
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000566
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00120
AC:
303
AN:
251464
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00112
AC XY:
152
AN XY:
135902
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000229
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000879
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000383
AC:
560
AN:
1461872
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000364
AC XY:
265
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0130
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000360
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000281
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000545
AC:
83
AN:
152284
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000618
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0145
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000566
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000280
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000703
ExAC
AF:
0.00129
AC:
157
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:18Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 02, 2017- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoFeb 17, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 03, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterreference populationSoonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical CenterMar 18, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterJul 04, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJan 02, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 24, 2020- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 06, 2016Variant summary: The MSH2 c.1886A>G (p.Gln629Arg) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/3 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 159/123118 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the East Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0174486 (151/8654). This frequency is about 31 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic MSH2 variant (0.0005683), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of East Asian origin. This variant has also been reported in colorectal patients or HNPCC-related cancer without strong evidence for pathogenicity. In a family, while affected proband carried the variant, another affected cousin did not carry the variant, possibly suggesting that it did not co-segregate with disease in the family (Woo_2014). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 29, 2018This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24933000, 22995991, 22283331, 22949387, 29506494, 27487738, 15365995, 21155023, 22290698, 20965939, 23760103, 24728327, 12132870, 26332594, 25985138, 24078570, 29642919, 15996210, 16929514, 18257912, 18383312, 18636359, 18726168, 24396821, 28580595) -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioFeb 07, 2022- -
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The MSH2 p.Gln629Arg variant was identified in 8 of 882 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.009) from individuals or families with colon cancer, gastric cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma (Jin 2008, Lee 2005, Lim 2010, Shin 2004, Wang 2006, Yano 2007, Yap 2009, Zhang 2006). Yuan (2004) also found the variant in 7 of 200 chromosomes in unaffected individuals (freq 0.035), and therefore classified the variant as a polymorphism. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs61756468) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (as benign, reviewed by an expert panel), Clinvitae (as benign), Cosmic, Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (reported 19x as benign), Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (reported 6x), Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, and Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was not identified in MutDB, UMD-LSDB, MMR Gene Unclassified Variants Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 317 of 277184 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0011 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include East Asian in 304 (1 homozygous) of 18870 chromosomes (freq: 0.01611), Other in 2 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.000309), European (Non-Finnish) in 1 of 126690 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), European (Finnish) in 3 of 25786 chromosomes (freq: 0.000116), and South Asian in 7 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.000227), while the variant was not observed in the African, Latino, or Ashkenazi Jewish populations. The p.Gln629 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panelresearchInternational Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)Sep 05, 2013Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability <0.001 -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Muir-Torré syndrome;C2936783:Lynch syndrome 1;C5436806:Mismatch repair cancer syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsAug 30, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.076
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.12
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.070
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.45
T;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.65
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.50
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.51
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.72
T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.37
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.85
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N;N;.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.51
Sift
Benign
0.32
T;T;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.12
T;T;.;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.30
MVP
1.0
MPC
0.0064
ClinPred
0.0094
T
GERP RS
2.3
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.57

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61756468; hg19: chr2-47702290; COSMIC: COSV51875543; COSMIC: COSV51875543; API