rs63750280
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.1864C>A(p.Pro622Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P622L) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000251.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.1864C>A | p.Pro622Thr | missense_variant | 12/16 | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.1864C>A | p.Pro622Thr | missense_variant | 12/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Lynch syndrome 1 Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Aug 04, 2023 | This variant is considered likely pathogenic. This variant is expected to disrupt protein structure [Myriad internal data]. Functional studies indicate this variant impacts protein function [PMID: 30998989]. - |
not provided Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 06, 2017 | This variant is denoted MSH2 c.1864C>A at the cDNA level, p.Pro622Thr (P622T) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Proline to a Threonine (CCA>ACA). This variant was observed in at least one individual from with colorectal cancer as well as MSH2-absent bladder and ureter cancers (Skeldon 2013). This variant was also identified in an individual with colon cancer from a family meeting Amsterdam I criteria (Chialina 2006). In addition, a different variant at the same position, Pro622Leu, has been reported in individuals with Lynch syndrome and functional studies have demonstrated impaired function compared to wild type (Mastrocola 2010, Drost 2012, Thompson 2013).MSH2 Pro622Thr was not observed in large population cohorts (Lek 2016, The 1000 Genomes Consortium 2015, NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project). Since Proline and Threonine differ in polarity, charge, size or other properties, this is considered a non-conservative amino acid substitution. MSH2 Pro622Thr occurs at a position that is conserved across species and is located in the ATPase domain and the region of interaction with EXO1 (Lutzen 2008). In silico analyses predict that this variant is probably damaging to protein structure and function. Based on the currently available evidence, we consider MSH2 Pro622Thr to be a likely pathogenic variant. - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 16, 2023 | Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (PMID: 33357406) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt MSH2 function. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. This variant disrupts the p.Leu622 amino acid residue in MSH2. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 8261515, 16616355, 17720936, 19267393, 21309037, 22949379, 24362816). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects MSH2 function (PMID: 28422960, 30998989). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 90805). This missense change has been observed in individuals with clinical features of Lynch syndrome (PMID: 16426447, 22883484, 25025451, 25117503, 28874130, 29987844). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 622 of the MSH2 protein (p.Pro622Thr). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 13, 2019 | The p.P622T variant (also known as c.1864C>A), located in coding exon 12 of the MSH2 gene, results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 1864. The proline at codon 622 is replaced by threonine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been reported in two families meeting Amsterdam Criteria (Chialina SG et al. BMC Med. Genet. 2006 Jan 20;7:5; Rosty C et al. Fam. Cancer. 2014 Dec;13(4):573-82). This alteration has also been reported in individuals diagnosed with colon, endometrial and prostate cancers, with tumors showing high microsatellite instability and/or loss of MSH2 and/or MSH6 by IHC (Chialina SG et al. BMC Med. Genet. 2006 Jan 20;7:5; Skeldon SC et al. Eur. Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):379-85; Chui MH et al. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2014 Sep;38(9):1173-81; Rosty C et al. Fam. Cancer. 2014 Dec;13(4):573-82). Based on internal structural analysis, this variant is anticipated to result in a significant decrease in structural stability (Ambry internal data). This variant was not reported in population-based cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by MAPP-MMR in silico analyses (Chao E et al. Hum Mutat. 2008 Jun;29(6):852-60). Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at