rs63750505
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.972G>A(p.Gln324=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000812 in 1,612,630 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000085 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MSH2
NM_000251.3 synonymous
NM_000251.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.51
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
BP6
Variant 2-47416325-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47416325-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 91264.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47416325-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.51 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.972G>A | p.Gln324= | synonymous_variant | 6/16 | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.972G>A | p.Gln324= | synonymous_variant | 6/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
152170
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000756 AC: 19AN: 251434Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000736 AC XY: 10AN XY: 135896
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
19
AN:
251434
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
135896
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000849 AC: 124AN: 1460342Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000674 AC XY: 49AN XY: 726642
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
124
AN:
1460342
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
49
AN XY:
726642
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152288Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74452
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
152288
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74452
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Nov 20, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 21, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Sep 07, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 07, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 18, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 23, 2018 | Variant summary: MSH2 c.972G>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MSH2 causing Lynch Syndrome phenotype (0.00057), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. The c.972G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Lynch Syndrome. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (MLH1 c.676C>T, p.R226*), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 12, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10777691) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Dec 27, 2018 | - - |
MSH2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 22, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The MSH2 p.Gln324= variant was identified in 1 of 30 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.03) from individuals or families with colorectal cancer and was not identified in 284 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Nomura 2000). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs63750505) as With Likely benign allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, and as likely benign by InSIGHT, Ambry Genetics, Counsyl, and Gene Dx), Clinvitae (classified as likely benign by ClinVar; as benign by Invitae), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (4X class2), Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, and Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (4X class 2). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, UMD-LSDB, or the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 21 of 277184 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000076 in following populations: Asian in 16 of 18866 chromosomes (freq. 0.001), European in 3 of 126678 chromosomes (freq. 0.00002), Latino in 2 of 34416 chromosomes (freq. 0.0001) increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Gln324= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. However, 2 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing (loss of a cryptic splice site); this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | research | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Sep 05, 2013 | Synonymous substitution with no effect on splicing tested with NMD inhibitor - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at