rs6554827
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.4374G>T(p.Arg1458Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.429 in 1,613,476 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 151,301 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001369.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001369.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAH5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.4374G>T | p.Arg1458Arg | synonymous | Exon 28 of 79 | ENSP00000265104.4 | Q8TE73 | ||
| DNAH5 | c.4329G>T | p.Arg1443Arg | synonymous | Exon 28 of 79 | ENSP00000505288.1 | A0A7P0Z455 | |||
| DNAH5-AS1 | TSL:4 | n.253+4064C>A | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.395 AC: 60025AN: 151834Hom.: 12213 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.402 AC: 100972AN: 251218 AF XY: 0.410 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.433 AC: 632584AN: 1461524Hom.: 139070 Cov.: 46 AF XY: 0.434 AC XY: 315392AN XY: 727084 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.395 AC: 60087AN: 151952Hom.: 12231 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.394 AC XY: 29272AN XY: 74252 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at