rs6795970

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_006514.4(SCN10A):​c.3218T>C​(p.Val1073Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.627 in 1,594,466 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 318,682 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1073I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.70 ( 38763 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.62 ( 279919 hom. )

Consequence

SCN10A
NM_006514.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.04

Publications

157 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN10A (HGNC:10582): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 10) The protein encoded by this gene is a tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel alpha subunit. The properties of the channel formed by the encoded transmembrane protein can be altered by interaction with different beta subunits. This protein may be involved in the onset of pain associated with peripheral neuropathy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]
SCN10A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • sodium channelopathy-related small fiber neuropathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • episodic pain syndrome, familial, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina, Ambry Genetics
  • Brugada syndrome
    Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • Brugada syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=7.03869E-7).
BP6
Variant 3-38725184-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38725184-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 259996.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.9 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SCN10ANM_006514.4 linkc.3218T>C p.Val1073Ala missense_variant Exon 18 of 28 ENST00000449082.3 NP_006505.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN10AENST00000449082.3 linkc.3218T>C p.Val1073Ala missense_variant Exon 18 of 28 1 NM_006514.4 ENSP00000390600.2
SCN10AENST00000643924.1 linkc.3215T>C p.Val1072Ala missense_variant Exon 17 of 27 ENSP00000495595.1
SCN10AENST00000655275.1 linkc.3242T>C p.Val1081Ala missense_variant Exon 18 of 28 ENSP00000499510.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.700
AC:
106402
AN:
151966
Hom.:
38689
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.907
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.550
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.677
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.588
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.850
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.664
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.543
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.611
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.605
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.653
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.652
AC:
161934
AN:
248186
AF XY:
0.644
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.911
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.688
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.581
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.848
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.548
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.603
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.620
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.619
AC:
893149
AN:
1442382
Hom.:
279919
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.618
AC XY:
442210
AN XY:
715412
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.917
AC:
30453
AN:
33202
American (AMR)
AF:
0.686
AC:
30267
AN:
44098
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.582
AC:
15049
AN:
25840
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.851
AC:
33500
AN:
39346
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.643
AC:
54279
AN:
84368
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.549
AC:
29172
AN:
53116
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.546
AC:
3076
AN:
5634
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.601
AC:
659788
AN:
1097380
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.632
AC:
37565
AN:
59398
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.473
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15315
30630
45946
61261
76576
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18306
36612
54918
73224
91530
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.701
AC:
106542
AN:
152084
Hom.:
38763
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.699
AC XY:
51984
AN XY:
74352
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.907
AC:
37664
AN:
41512
American (AMR)
AF:
0.678
AC:
10361
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.588
AC:
2041
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.851
AC:
4402
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.664
AC:
3197
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.543
AC:
5733
AN:
10562
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.612
AC:
180
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.605
AC:
41082
AN:
67954
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.655
AC:
1383
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1533
3066
4600
6133
7666
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
812
1624
2436
3248
4060
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.636
Hom.:
150645
Bravo
AF:
0.719
TwinsUK
AF:
0.604
AC:
2239
ALSPAC
AF:
0.596
AC:
2297
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.899
AC:
3961
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.602
AC:
5176
ExAC
AF:
0.657
AC:
79802
Asia WGS
AF:
0.771
AC:
2681
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 22, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jun 10, 2016
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 04, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Brugada syndrome Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Episodic pain syndrome, familial, 2 Benign:1
Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 03, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.064
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.59
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
0.66
DANN
Benign
0.54
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.031
T;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0032
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.060
.;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
7.0e-7
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.91
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.55
N;.;N;.
PhyloP100
-1.0
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.51
N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.21
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;B;.
Vest4
0.0060
MPC
0.070
ClinPred
0.00070
T
GERP RS
-4.6
Varity_R
0.024
gMVP
0.20
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6795970; hg19: chr3-38766675; COSMIC: COSV107530171; API